Literature DB >> 15773649

Functional outcome after fracture of both bones of the forearm.

C A Goldfarb1, W M Ricci, F Tull, D Ray, J Borrelli.   

Abstract

Our aim was to correlate the health status with objective and radiological outcomes in patients treated by open reduction and internal fixation for fractures of both bones of the forearm. We assessed 23 patients (24 fractures) subjectively, objectively and radiologically at a mean of 34 months (11 to 72). Subjective assessment used the disability of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) and musculoskeletal functional attachment (MFA) questionnaires. The range of movement of the forearm and wrist, grip and pinch strength were measured objectively and standardised radiographs were evaluated. In general, patients reported good overall function based on the DASH (mean 12; range 0 to 42) and MFA (mean 19; range 0 to 51) scores. However, pronation and grip and pinch strength were significantly decreased (p < 0.005). These deficiencies correlated with poorer subjective outcomes. Operative stabilisation of fractures of the radius and ulna led to a reliably acceptable functional outcome. However, despite these generally satisfactory results, the outcome scores worsened with reduction in the range of movement of the forearm and wrist.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15773649     DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.87b3.15509

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br        ISSN: 0301-620X


  9 in total

1.  CORR Insights®: Union Rates and Reported Range of Motion Are Acceptable After Open Forearm Fractures in Military Combatants.

Authors:  Col R Kathleen A McHale
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Union Rates and Reported Range of Motion Are Acceptable After Open Forearm Fractures in Military Combatants.

Authors:  Kyle E Nappo; Benjamin W Hoyt; George C Balazs; George P Nanos; Derek F Ipsen; Scott M Tintle; Elizabeth M Polfer
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Internal fixation of fractures of both bones forearm: Comparison of locked compression and limited contact dynamic compression plate.

Authors:  Kc Saikia; Sk Bhuyan; Td Bhattacharya; M Borgohain; P Jitesh; F Ahmed
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 1.251

4.  Nonoperatively treated forearm shaft fractures in children show good long-term recovery.

Authors:  Juha-Jaakko Sinikumpu; Sarita Victorzon; Eeva Antila; Tytti Pokka; Willy Serlo
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2014-09-19       Impact factor: 3.717

Review 5.  Development and Validation of Indicators for Population Injury Surveillance in Hong Kong: Development and Usability Study.

Authors:  Keith T S Tung; Rosa S Wong; Frederick K Ho; Ko Ling Chan; Wilfred H S Wong; Hugo Leung; Ming Leung; Gilberto K K Leung; Chun Bong Chow; Patrick Ip
Journal:  JMIR Public Health Surveill       Date:  2022-08-18

6.  What Is the Normal Ulnar Bow in Adult Patients?

Authors:  Jeremy Hreha; Dominick V Congiusta; Irfan H Ahmed; Michael M Vosbikian
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 4.755

7.  Shaft Fractures of Both Forearm Bones: The Outcomes of Surgical Treatment with Plating Only and Combined Plating and Intramedullary Nailing.

Authors:  Sang Bum Kim; Youn Moo Heo; Jin Woong Yi; Jung Bum Lee; Byoung Gu Lim
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2015-08-13

Review 8.  Reconstruction of malunited diaphyseal fractures of the forearm.

Authors:  Prakash Jayakumar; Jesse B Jupiter
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2014-09

9.  The importance of patient compliance in nonunion of forearm fracture.

Authors:  Ersin Kuyucu; Figen Koçyiğit; Lügen Ciftçi
Journal:  Int J Surg Case Rep       Date:  2014-07-01
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.