Literature DB >> 15773606

The structure of sensory events and the accuracy of time judgments.

Simon Grondin1, Marie-Eve Roussel, Pierre-Luc Gamache, Martin Roy, Bastien Ouellet.   

Abstract

We investigated how does the structure of empty time intervals influence temporal processing. In experiment 1, the intervals to be discriminated were the silent durations marked by two sensory signals, both lasting 10 or 500 ms; these signals were two identical flashes (intramodal: VV), or one visual flash (V) followed by an auditory tone (A) (intermodal: VA). For the range of duration under investigation (standards = 0.2, 0.6, 1, or 1.4 s), the results indicated that both the marker length and sensory mode influenced discrimination, but no interaction between these variables or between one of these variables and standard duration was significant. In experiment 2, we compared, for each of four marker-type conditions (VV, AA, VA, AV; and standard = 1 s), intervals marked by two 10 ms signals with intervals marked by unequal signal length (markers 1 and 2 lasting 10 and 500 ms, or 500 and 10 ms). As in experiment 1, the results revealed significant marker-mode and marker-length effects, but no significant interaction between these variables. Experiment 3 showed that, for the same conditions as in experiment 2, perceived duration is not influenced by marker length and that the variability of interval reproductions does not depend on the perceived duration of intervals. The results are discussed in the light of a single-clock hypothesis: marker-length and marker-mode effects are presented as being non-temporal sources of variability associated mainly with sensory and memory processes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15773606     DOI: 10.1068/p5369

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perception        ISSN: 0301-0066            Impact factor:   1.490


  11 in total

1.  Modality-independent role of the primary auditory cortex in time estimation.

Authors:  Ryota Kanai; Harriet Lloyd; Domenica Bueti; Vincent Walsh
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-02-12       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Fast transfer of crossmodal time interval training.

Authors:  Lihan Chen; Xiaolin Zhou
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-02-26       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Dissecting the clock: understanding the mechanisms of timing across tasks and temporal intervals.

Authors:  Ashley S Bangert; Patricia A Reuter-Lorenz; Rachael D Seidler
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2010-10-16

4.  Audition dominates vision in duration perception irrespective of salience, attention, and temporal discriminability.

Authors:  Laura Ortega; Emmanuel Guzman-Martinez; Marcia Grabowecky; Satoru Suzuki
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  The sensory representation of time.

Authors:  Domenica Bueti
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2011-08-08

6.  EEG investigations of duration discrimination: the intermodal effect is induced by an attentional bias.

Authors:  Emilie Gontier; Emi Hasuo; Takako Mitsudo; Simon Grondin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-23       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Why studying intermodal duration discrimination matters.

Authors:  Simon Grondin
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-07-01

8.  A tRNS investigation of the sensory representation of time.

Authors:  G Mioni; S Grondin; D Mapelli; F Stablum
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-07-09       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Rate after-effects fail to transfer cross-modally: Evidence for distributed sensory timing mechanisms.

Authors:  Aysha Motala; James Heron; Paul V McGraw; Neil W Roach; David Whitaker
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-01-17       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Stop signals delay synchrony more for finger tapping than vocalization: a dual modality study of rhythmic synchronization in the stop signal task.

Authors:  Leidy J Castro-Meneses; Paul F Sowman
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-07-12       Impact factor: 2.984

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.