Literature DB >> 15773485

Multimedia fate and human intake modeling: spatial versus nonspatial insights for chemical emissions in Western Europe.

David W Pennington1, Manuele Margni, Christoph Ammann, Olivier Jolliet.   

Abstract

Multimedia fate and multipathway human exposure models are widely adopted in assessments of toxicological risks of chemical emissions at the regional scale. This paper addresses the question of how much spatial detail is necessary in such models when estimating the intake by the entire population in large, heterogeneous regions such as Europe. The paper presents a spatially resolved multimedia fate and multipathway exposure model for Western Europe, available as IMPACT 2002. This model accounts for relationships between the location of food production and drinking water extraction as well as where population cohorts live relative to where chemical emissions occur. The model facilitates estimation of environmental concentration distributions, related levels of contaminants in foods, and the fraction of a chemical release that will be taken in by the entire human population (the intake fraction) at the regional scale. To evaluate the necessary spatial resolution, the paper compares estimates of environmental concentrations and the intake fraction from the spatially resolved model with the results of a consistent clone without spatial resolution. An evaluation for disperse emissions of PeCDF (2,3,4,7,8-pentachlorodibenzofuran, CAS# 5120731-4) suggests reasonable agreement with monitoring data for most impact pathways with both versions of the model, but that the generic vegetation models for estimating contaminant concentrations in agricultural produce require improvement. A broader comparison for a range of organic chemicals demonstrates that the nonspatial models are likely to be appropriate in general for assessing dispersed sources of emissions. However, it is necessary to include generic compartments in such nonspatial models to account separately for emissions that enter lakes with long residence times versus rivers that feed directly into seas. For assessing an emission source in a specific location, using models that are not spatially resolved can result in underestimation, or overestimation, of the population's intake by at least 3 orders of magnitude for some chemicals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15773485     DOI: 10.1021/es034598x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  8 in total

1.  Examining Screening-Level Multimedia Models Through a Comparison Framework for Landfill Management.

Authors:  Zunaira Asif; Zhi Chen
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2015-09-05       Impact factor: 3.266

2.  Approaches for controlling air pollutants and their environmental impacts generated from coal-based electricity generation in China.

Authors:  Changqing Xu; Jinglan Hong; Yixin Ren; Qingsong Wang; Xueliang Yuan
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-04-23       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Characterizing environmental geographic inequalities using an integrated exposure assessment.

Authors:  Julien Caudeville; Corentin Regrain; Frederic Tognet; Roseline Bonnard; Mohammed Guedda; Celine Brochot; Maxime Beauchamp; Laurent Letinois; Laure Malherbe; Fabrice Marliere; Francois Lestremau; Karen Chardon; Veronique Bach; Florence Anna Zeman
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 5.984

4.  Assessment of regional human health risks from lead contamination in Yunnan province, southwestern China.

Authors:  Lu Lu; Hongguang Cheng; Xuelian Liu; Jing Xie; Qian Li; Tan Zhou
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-20       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  Using exposure bands for rapid decision making in the RISK21 tiered exposure assessment.

Authors:  M Dellarco; R Zaleski; B J Gaborek; H Qian; C A Bellin; P Egeghy; N Heard; O Jolliet; D R Lander; N Sunger; K S Stylianou; J Y Tanir
Journal:  Crit Rev Toxicol       Date:  2017-02-10       Impact factor: 5.635

6.  Life Cycle Impact Assessment of Garbage-Classification Based Municipal Solid Waste Management Systems: A Comparative Case Study in China.

Authors:  Yujun Yuan; Tong Li; Qiang Zhai
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-07-23       Impact factor: 3.390

7.  Data supporting the comparative life cycle assessment of different municipal solid waste management scenarios.

Authors:  Mohammad Ali Rajaeifar; Meisam Tabatabaei; Hossein Ghanavati
Journal:  Data Brief       Date:  2015-03-20

8.  Spatio-Temporal Distribution of Environmental Health Risk of Heavy Metals in Industrial Wastewater of China during 1999-2018.

Authors:  Ruru Han; Beihai Zhou; Huilun Chen
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-05-31       Impact factor: 3.390

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.