GOALS OF WORK: Professional care providers need a substantial basis of competence and expertise to provide appropriate palliative care. Little is known about the problems professionals experience in their palliative care provision in daily practice or about the nature of the advice and support they request from experts. Our aim was to investigate the extent to which professionals requested assistance from palliative care consultation teams and the reasons behind these requests to trace any gaps they experience in the provision of palliative care. METHODS: As part of a large national palliative care development programme, we studied requests for consultation made by professional care providers over a 2-year period. The requests for consultation were recorded on a specially developed standard registration form and classified according to 11 domains relevant to palliative care. MAIN RESULTS: Professional care providers requested 4351 consultations on account of 8413 specific problems in 11 quality-of-life and quality-of-care domains. The distribution of problems over these domains was unbalanced: 42.2% of the specific problems were physical, while the percentages of psychological, pharmacological and organizational problems were 7.7, 12.5 and 12.8%, respectively. In contrast, issues of a spiritual nature or concerned with daily functioning were raised infrequently (1.1 and 0.9%). Details of the specific problems in all the domains are described in the text and tables. CONCLUSIONS: The results of our study form a valid basis on which to develop and implement improvements in palliative care. We recommend that future well-founded policies for palliative care should incorporate palliative care consultation as well as educational and organizational interventions.
GOALS OF WORK: Professional care providers need a substantial basis of competence and expertise to provide appropriate palliative care. Little is known about the problems professionals experience in their palliative care provision in daily practice or about the nature of the advice and support they request from experts. Our aim was to investigate the extent to which professionals requested assistance from palliative care consultation teams and the reasons behind these requests to trace any gaps they experience in the provision of palliative care. METHODS: As part of a large national palliative care development programme, we studied requests for consultation made by professional care providers over a 2-year period. The requests for consultation were recorded on a specially developed standard registration form and classified according to 11 domains relevant to palliative care. MAIN RESULTS: Professional care providers requested 4351 consultations on account of 8413 specific problems in 11 quality-of-life and quality-of-care domains. The distribution of problems over these domains was unbalanced: 42.2% of the specific problems were physical, while the percentages of psychological, pharmacological and organizational problems were 7.7, 12.5 and 12.8%, respectively. In contrast, issues of a spiritual nature or concerned with daily functioning were raised infrequently (1.1 and 0.9%). Details of the specific problems in all the domains are described in the text and tables. CONCLUSIONS: The results of our study form a valid basis on which to develop and implement improvements in palliative care. We recommend that future well-founded policies for palliative care should incorporate palliative care consultation as well as educational and organizational interventions.
Authors: J S Gardner-Nix; R Brodie; E Tjan; M Wilton; L Zoberman; F Barnes; J Friedrich; J Wood Journal: J Palliat Care Date: 1995 Impact factor: 2.250
Authors: Catherine Shipman; Julia Addington-Hall; Stephen Barclay; Jill Briggs; Ivan Cox; Lilian Daniels; David Millar Journal: Palliat Med Date: 2002-05 Impact factor: 4.762
Authors: Annemieke Kuin; Annemie M Courtens; Luc Deliens; Myrra J F J Vernooij-Dassen; Lia van Zuylen; Barbara van der Linden; Gerrit van der Wal Journal: J Pain Symptom Manage Date: 2004-01 Impact factor: 3.612
Authors: S C C M Teunissen; E H Verhagen; M Brink; B A van der Linden; E E Voest; A de Graeff Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2006-12-13 Impact factor: 3.359
Authors: Bregje Thoonsen; Kris Vissers; S Verhagen; J Prins; H Bor; C van Weel; M Groot; Y Engels Journal: BMC Fam Pract Date: 2015-09-22 Impact factor: 2.497