Literature DB >> 15772473

Laparoscopic splenectomy for hematologic disorders: experience with the first fifty patients.

Pradeep K Chowbey1, Amit Goel, Rashmi Panse, Anil Sharma, Rajesh Khullar, Vandana Soni, Manish Baijal.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Splenectomy is increasingly being performed by various minimal access surgical modalities for select hematologic disorders.
METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed on the first 50 patients on whom laparoscopic splenectomy (LS) was attempted. The data studied included indications for surgery, patient demographics, intraoperative parameters, and patient outcomes. A total laparoscopic approach (TLS) was employed in 38 patients and a hand-assisted technique (HALS) was used in 12 patients with massive splenomegaly. Eight patients had concomitant surgical procedures: 7 patients underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy and 1 patient received a kidney transplant. The most common indications for LS were idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP) (50%) and hereditary spherocytosis (24%).
RESULTS: LS was successfully completed in 48 patients (96%). Thirty-four patients (68%) required perioperative blood or platelet transfusions. The mean spleen diameter was 17.1 cm (range, 11.2-28.4 cm) on imaging study and mean intact splenic weight was 1019 gm. The mean operative time was 188 minutes (range, 90-340 minutes) in the TLS group and 171 minutes (range, 120-240 minutes) in the HALS group. The mean intraoperative blood loss was 306 mL (range, 40-640 mL) in the TLS group and 163 mL (range, 100-300 mL) in the HALS group. The mean postoperative hospital stay was 3.2 days (range, 2-5 days).
CONCLUSION: TLS is safe and feasible in patients with nonpalpable spleens. A concomitant laparoscopic procedure for treating coexisting abdominal pathology may be performed without additional morbidity. The HALS technique may be preferable in patients with splenomegaly (palpable spleens), as it appears to offer intraoperative advantages for retraction, dissection, hemostasis, and organ retrieval.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15772473     DOI: 10.1089/lap.2005.15.28

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A        ISSN: 1092-6429            Impact factor:   1.878


  5 in total

1.  Handheld gamma probe used to detect accessory spleens during initial laparoscopic splenectomies.

Authors:  Umut Barbaros; Ahmet Dinççağ; Yesim Erbil; Selcuk Mercan; Yasemin Sanli; Işik Adalet; Reyhan Küçükkaya
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-09-06       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Laparoscopic splenectomy: a personal series of 140 consecutive cases.

Authors:  Clare J Pattenden; Christopher D Mann; Matthew S Metcalfe; Martin Dyer; David M Lloyd
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2010-05-19       Impact factor: 1.891

3.  Prospective randomized comparison of clinical results between hand-assisted laparoscopic and open splenectomies.

Authors:  Umut Barbaros; Ahmet Dinççağ; Aziz Sümer; Rosario Vecchio; Domenico Rusello; Valentina Randazzo; Halim Issever; Cavit Avci
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-06-24       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Laparoscopic splenectomy in patients of β thalassemia: Our experience.

Authors:  Nirmal M Patle; Om Tantia; Prakash Kumar Sasmal; Shashi Khanna; Bimalendu Sen
Journal:  J Minim Access Surg       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 1.407

5.  Challenges and Results of Laparoscopic Splenectomy for Hematological Diseases in a Developing Country.

Authors:  Vikal Chandra Shakya; Bikram Byanjankar; Rabin Pandit; Anang Pangeni; Anir Ram Moh Shrestha; Bishesh Poudyal
Journal:  Minim Invasive Surg       Date:  2018-08-01
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.