Literature DB >> 15772108

A marginal model approach for analysis of multi-reader multi-test receiver operating characteristic (ROC) data.

Xiao Song1, Xiao-Hua Zhou.   

Abstract

The receiver operating characteristic curve is a popular tool to characterize the capabilities of diagnostic tests with continuous or ordinal responses. One common design for assessing the accuracy of diagnostic tests involves multiple readers and multiple tests, in which all readers read all test results from the same patients. This design is most commonly used in a radiology setting, where the results of diagnostic tests depend on a radiologist's subjective interpretation. The most widely used approach for analyzing data from such a study is the Dorfman-Berbaum-Metz (DBM) method (Dorfman et al., 1992) which utilizes a standard analysis of variance (ANOVA) model for the jackknife pseudovalues of the area under the ROC curves (AUCs). Although the DBM method has performed well in published simulation studies, there is no clear theoretical basis for this approach. In this paper, focusing on continuous outcomes, we investigate its theoretical basis. Our result indicates that the DBM method does not satisfy the regular assumptions for standard ANOVA models, and thus might lead to erroneous inference. We then propose a marginal model approach based on the AUCs which can adjust for covariates as well. Consistent and asymptotically normal estimators are derived for regression coefficients. We compare our approach with the DBM method via simulation and by an application to data from a breast cancer study. The simulation results show that both our method and the DBM method perform well when the accuracy of tests under the study is the same and that our method outperforms the DBM method for inference on individual AUCs when the accuracy of tests is not the same. The marginal model approach can be easily extended to ordinal outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15772108     DOI: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxi011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biostatistics        ISSN: 1465-4644            Impact factor:   5.899


  10 in total

1.  Multireader multicase reader studies with binary agreement data: simulation, analysis, validation, and sizing.

Authors:  Weijie Chen; Adam Wunderlich; Nicholas Petrick; Brandon D Gallas
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2014-12-04

2.  Generalized Roe and Metz receiver operating characteristic model: analytic link between simulated decision scores and empirical AUC variances and covariances.

Authors:  Brandon D Gallas; Stephen L Hillis
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2014-09-25

3.  Subject-centered free-response ROC (FROC) analysis.

Authors:  Andriy I Bandos; Howard E Rockette; David Gur
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Nonparametric ROC summary statistics for correlated diagnostic marker data.

Authors:  Liansheng Larry Tang; Aiyi Liu; Zhen Chen; Enrique F Schisterman; Bo Zhang; Zhuang Miao
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2012-10-11       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  Power calculation for comparing diagnostic accuracies in a multi-reader, multi-test design.

Authors:  Eunhee Kim; Zheng Zhang; Youdan Wang; Donglin Zeng
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2014-10-29       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Simulation of unequal-variance binormal multireader ROC decision data: an extension of the Roe and Metz simulation model.

Authors:  Stephen L Hillis
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 3.173

Review 7.  Statistical approaches for modeling radiologists' interpretive performance.

Authors:  Diana L Miglioretti; Sebastien J P A Haneuse; Melissa L Anderson
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.173

8.  Relationship between Roe and Metz simulation model for multireader diagnostic data and Obuchowski-Rockette model parameters.

Authors:  Stephen L Hillis
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2018-04-02       Impact factor: 2.373

9.  A marginal-mean ANOVA approach for analyzing multireader multicase radiological imaging data.

Authors:  Stephen L Hillis
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2013-08-23       Impact factor: 2.373

10.  MicroRNAs as Urinary Biomarker for Oncocytoma.

Authors:  Melanie von Brandenstein; Monika Schlosser; Jan Herden; Axel Heidenreich; Stefan Störkel; Jochen W U Fries
Journal:  Dis Markers       Date:  2018-07-16       Impact factor: 3.464

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.