S Y Y Fong1, C K W Ho, Y K Wing. 1. Department of Psychiatry, Shatin Hospital, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong, China.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to compare the use of Multiple Sleep Latency Test (MSLT) and Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) in measuring excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) in patients with different severity of obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome (OSAS). METHOD: Two hundred ninety-six consecutive OSAS patients, with their EDS measured by a Chinese version of ESS and a five-nap MSLT, and their severity of OSAS (determined by respiratory disturbance index) by a nocturnal polysomnogram, were classified into mild (RDI 5-15/h, n=59), moderate (RDI 15-30/h, n=71) and severe (RDI >30/h, n=166) groups, respectively. Their ESS, MSLT and other sleep parameters were compared. RESULTS: The severe group had significantly shorter mean sleep latency (MSL=6.26+/-4.90 min) than the moderate (8.26+/-4.57 min) and mild groups had (8.07+/-4.37 min). There was no significant difference in their ESS scores. CONCLUSION: MSLT is better than ESS in the measurement of EDS in relation to the severity of OSAS in clinical patients.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to compare the use of Multiple Sleep Latency Test (MSLT) and Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) in measuring excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) in patients with different severity of obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome (OSAS). METHOD: Two hundred ninety-six consecutive OSAS patients, with their EDS measured by a Chinese version of ESS and a five-nap MSLT, and their severity of OSAS (determined by respiratory disturbance index) by a nocturnal polysomnogram, were classified into mild (RDI 5-15/h, n=59), moderate (RDI 15-30/h, n=71) and severe (RDI >30/h, n=166) groups, respectively. Their ESS, MSLT and other sleep parameters were compared. RESULTS: The severe group had significantly shorter mean sleep latency (MSL=6.26+/-4.90 min) than the moderate (8.26+/-4.57 min) and mild groups had (8.07+/-4.37 min). There was no significant difference in their ESS scores. CONCLUSION: MSLT is better than ESS in the measurement of EDS in relation to the severity of OSAS in clinical patients.
Authors: Bernie Y Sunwoo; Nicholas Jackson; Greg Maislin; Indira Gurubhagavatula; Charles F George; Allan I Pack Journal: Sleep Date: 2012-01-01 Impact factor: 5.849
Authors: Jon-Erik Cleophas Holty; Neeta Parimi; Michael Ballesteros; Terri Blackwell; Paul T Cirangle; Gregg H Jossart; Nicole D Kimbrough; Jennifer M Rose; Katie L Stone; Dena M Bravata Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2011-10 Impact factor: 4.129
Authors: Samu Kainulainen; Juha Töyräs; Arie Oksenberg; Henri Korkalainen; Sandra Sefa; Antti Kulkas; Timo Leppänen Journal: J Clin Sleep Med Date: 2019-08-15 Impact factor: 4.062