Literature DB >> 15771604

The efficacy of supplemental intraosseous anesthesia after insufficient mandibular block.

Samir Prohić1, Halid Sulejmanagić, Sadeta Secić.   

Abstract

It is a well-known scientific fact that only a small percentage of infiltration of inferior alveolar nerve is clinically proven to be efficient. The objective of this study was to determine the anesthetic efficacy of supplemental intraosseous injection, used after the insufficient classical mandibular block that didn't provide deep pulp anesthesia of mandibular molar planed for extraction. The experimental teeth consisted of 98 mandibular molars with clinical indication for extraction. Based on the history of disease, we indicated the extraction of the tooth. After that each tooth was tested with a electric pulp tester P1. We tested the pulp vitality and precisely determined the level of vitality. After that, each patient received classical mandibular block, and the pulp vitality was tested again. If the pulp tester indicated negative vitality for the certain mandibular molar, and the patient didn't complain about pain or discomfort during the extraction, the molar was extracted and the result was added to anesthetic success rate for the classical mandibular block. If, five minutes after receiving the mandibular block, the pulp tester indicated positive vitality (parameters of vitality) or the patient complained about pain or discomfort (parameters of pain and discomfort), we used the Stabident intraosseous anesthesia system. Three minutes after the application of supplemental intraosseous injection the molar was tested with the pulp tester again. The anesthetic solution used in both anesthetic techniques is lidocaine with 1:100.000 epinephrine. The results of this study indicate that the anesthetic efficacy of the mandibular block is 74.5%, and that supplemental intraosseous anesthesia, applied after the insufficient mandibular block, provides pulpal anesthesia in 94.9% of mandibular molars. The difference between anesthetic efficacy of the classical mandibular block and anesthetic efficacy of the supplemental intraosseous anesthesia, applied after the insufficient mandibular block, is obvious.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15771604      PMCID: PMC7214052          DOI: 10.17305/bjbms.2005.3336

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bosn J Basic Med Sci        ISSN: 1512-8601            Impact factor:   3.363


  7 in total

1.  The anatomy of the intraosseous injection.

Authors:  M S Leonard
Journal:  Dent Today       Date:  1998-09

2.  Anesthetic efficacy and heart rate effects of the intraosseous injection of 3% mepivacaine after an inferior alveolar nerve block.

Authors:  E Gallatin; P Stabile; A Reader; R Nist; M Beck
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod       Date:  2000-01

3.  Anesthetic efficacy of the intraosseous injection in maxillary and mandibular teeth.

Authors:  R Coggins; A Reader; R Nist; M Beck; W J Meyers
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod       Date:  1996-06

4.  Anesthetic efficacy of the intraosseous injection after an inferior alveolar nerve block.

Authors:  D Dunbar; A Reader; R Nist; M Beck; W J Meyers
Journal:  J Endod       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 4.171

5.  Intraosseous anesthesia.

Authors:  G D Magnes
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  1968-11

6.  Difficulties in achieving local anesthesia.

Authors:  E Kaufman; P Weinstein; P Milgrom
Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc       Date:  1984-02       Impact factor: 3.634

7.  Anesthetic efficacy of the supplemental intraosseous injection of 3% mepivacaine in irreversible pulpitis.

Authors:  D Reisman; A Reader; R Nist; M Beck; J Weaver
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod       Date:  1997-12
  7 in total
  5 in total

1.  Single tooth anesthesia versus conventional anesthesia: a cross-over study.

Authors:  Vincenzo Campanella; Antonio Libonati; Roberto Nardi; Vincenzo Angotti; Gianni Gallusi; Edoardo Montemurro; Maurizio D'Amario; Giuseppe Marzo
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2018-03-10       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Intraosseous anesthesia with solution injection controlled by a computerized system versus conventional oral anesthesia: a preliminary study.

Authors:  Rut Beneito-Brotons; David Peñarrocha-Oltra; Javier Ata-Ali; María Peñarrocha
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2012-05-01

3.  Side effects and complications of intraosseous anesthesia and conventional oral anesthesia.

Authors:  David Peñarrocha-Oltra; Javier Ata-Ali; María-José Oltra-Moscardó; María Peñarrocha-Diago; Miguel Peñarrocha
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2012-05-01

4.  Comparative study between manual injection intraosseous anesthesia and conventional oral anesthesia.

Authors:  D Peñarrocha-Oltra; J Ata-Ali; M-J Oltra-Moscardó; M-A Peñarrocha-Diago; M Peñarrocha
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2012-03-01

5.  Inferior alveolar nerve block by intraosseous injection with Quicksleeper® at the retromolar area in mandibular third molar surgery.

Authors:  Sam Sovatdy; Chakorn Vorakulpipat; Sirichai Kiattavorncharoen; Chavengkiat Saengsirinavin; Natthamet Wongsirichat
Journal:  J Dent Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2018-12-28
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.