Literature DB >> 15771004

Therapeutic electrical stimulation of the central nervous system.

Alim-Louis Benabid1, Bradley Wallace, John Mitrofanis, Celine Xia, Brigitte Piallat, Valérie Fraix, Alina Batir, Paul Krack, Pierre Pollak, François Berger.   

Abstract

The electrical effects on the nervous system have been known for long. The excitatory effect has been used for diagnostic purposes or even for therapeutic applications, like in pain using low-frequency stimulation of the spinal cord or of the thalamus. The discovery that High-Frequency Stimulation (HFS) mimics the effect of lesioning has opened a new field of therapeutic application of electrical stimulation in all places where lesion of neuronal structures, such as nuclei of the basal ganglia, had proven some therapeutic efficiency. This was first applied to the thalamus to mimic thalamotomy for the treatment of tremor, then to the subthalamic nucleus and the pallidum to treat some advanced forms of Parkinson's disease and control not only the tremor but also akinesia, rigidity and dyskinesias. The field of application is increasingly growing, currently encompassing dystonias, epilepsy, obsessive compulsive disease, cluster headaches, and experimental approaches are being made in the field of obesity and food intake control. Although the effects of stimulation are clear-cut and the therapeutic benefit is clearly recognized, the mechanism of action of HFS is not yet understood. The similarity between HFS and the effect of lesions in several places of the brain suggests that this might induce an inhibition-like process, which is difficult to explain with the classical concept of physiology where electrical stimulation means excitation of neural elements. The current data coming from either clinical or experimental observations are providing elements to shape a beginning of an understanding. Intra-cerebral recordings in human patients with artefact suppression tend to show the arrest of electrical firing in the recorded places. Animal experiments, either in vitro or in vivo, show complex patterns mixing inhibitory effects and frequency stimulation induced bursting activity, which would suggest that the mechanism is based upon the jamming of the neuronal message, which is by this way functionally suppressed. More recent data from in vitro biological studies show that HFS profoundly affects the cellular functioning and particularly the protein synthesis, suggesting that it could alter the synaptic transmission by reducing the production of neurotransmitters. It is now clear that this method has a larger field of application than currently known and that its therapeutical applications will benefit to several diseases of the nervous system. The understanding of the mechanism has opened a new field of research, which will call for reappraisal of the basic effects of electricity on the living tissues.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15771004     DOI: 10.1016/j.crvi.2004.10.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  C R Biol        ISSN: 1631-0691            Impact factor:   1.583


  9 in total

1.  Electrical stimulation therapies for CNS disorders and pain are mediated by competition between different neuronal networks in the brain.

Authors:  Carl L Faingold
Journal:  Med Hypotheses       Date:  2008-08-30       Impact factor: 1.538

2.  High frequency stimulation can suppress globally seizures induced by 4-AP in the rat hippocampus: an acute in vivo study.

Authors:  Chia-Chu Chiang; Chou-Ching K Lin; Ming-Shaung Ju; Dominique M Durand
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2012-05-15       Impact factor: 8.955

3.  GABA(A) autoreceptors enhance GABA release from human neocortex: towards a mechanism for high-frequency stimulation (HFS) in brain?

Authors:  Michela Mantovani; Andreas Moser; Carola A Haas; Josef Zentner; Thomas J Feuerstein
Journal:  Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol       Date:  2009-03-19       Impact factor: 3.000

Review 4.  A key role of the basal ganglia in pain and analgesia--insights gained through human functional imaging.

Authors:  David Borsook; Jaymin Upadhyay; Eric H Chudler; Lino Becerra
Journal:  Mol Pain       Date:  2010-05-13       Impact factor: 3.395

5.  Interactions Between Cultured Neurons and Carbon Nanotubes: A Nanoneuroscience Vignette.

Authors:  Antonietta Sucapane; Giada Cellot; Maurizio Prato; Michele Giugliano; Vladimir Parpura; Laura Ballerini
Journal:  J Nanoneurosci       Date:  2009-06-01

6.  Long-lasting hyperpolarization underlies seizure reduction by low frequency deep brain electrical stimulation.

Authors:  Sheela Toprani; Dominique M Durand
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2013-08-27       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  Alternating current electrical stimulation enhanced chemotherapy: a novel strategy to bypass multidrug resistance in tumor cells.

Authors:  Damir Janigro; Catalin Perju; Vincent Fazio; Kerri Hallene; Gabriele Dini; Mukesh K Agarwal; Luca Cucullo
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2006-03-17       Impact factor: 4.430

Review 8.  Human Thalamic Somatosensory Nucleus (Ventral Caudal, Vc) as a Locus for Stimulation by INPUTS from Tactile, Noxious and Thermal Sensors on an Active Prosthesis.

Authors:  Jui Hong Chien; Anna Korzeniewska; Luana Colloca; Claudia Campbell; Patrick Dougherty; Frederick Lenz
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2017-05-24       Impact factor: 3.576

9.  Potential of electric stimulation for the management of COVID-19.

Authors:  Prince Allawadhi; Amit Khurana; Sachin Allwadhi; Uma Shanker Navik; Kamaldeep Joshi; Anil Kumar Banothu; Kala Kumar Bharani
Journal:  Med Hypotheses       Date:  2020-09-10       Impact factor: 1.538

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.