Literature DB >> 15770691

Coexpression of the type 1 growth factor receptor family members HER-1, HER-2, and HER-3 has a synergistic negative prognostic effect on breast carcinoma survival.

Sam M Wiseman1, Nikita Makretsov, Torsten O Nielsen, Blake Gilks, Erika Yorida, Maggie Cheang, Dmitry Turbin, Karen Gelmon, David G Huntsman.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The clinical significance of coexpression of type 1 growth factor receptor (T1GFR) family members remains largely unknown. The objective of the current study was to determine the frequency and the possible prognostic effect of coexpression of HER-1, HER-2, HER-3, and HER-4 by breast carcinoma.
METHODS: Tissue microarrays were constructed using clinically annotated formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tumor samples from 242 patients with invasive breast carcinomas with a median 15-year follow-up. The levels of TIGFR family members (HER-1-HER-4) were measured by immunohistochemistry. K-means clustering algorithm, as well as univariate (Kaplan-Meier, log-rank test) and multivariate (Cox regression) survival analyses were applied to the data set.
RESULTS: Using univariate analysis, expression of HER-1, HER-2, and HER-3, but not HER-4, was significantly associated with decreased patient disease-specific survival (P < 0.05). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed that coexpression of >/= 2 of HER-1, HER-2, and HER-3 in any combination was associated with reduced patient disease-specific survival compared with single marker expression or no expression (35% vs. 65% vs. 78% 10-year survival rates, P = 0.001). Using multivariate analysis, expression of >/= 2 of HER-1, HER-2, and HER-3 was independent of lymph node status and tumor size.
CONCLUSIONS: In a cohort of patients with breast carcinoma, the authors observed T1GFR family member coexpression (HER-1, HER-2, and HER-3) to have a negative synergistic effect on patient outcome, independent of tumor size or lymph node status. Thus, coexpression of T1GFR family members identified a subset of patients with a poor disease prognosis who may potentially benefit from therapy simultaneously targeting several T1GFR family members. (c) 2005 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15770691     DOI: 10.1002/cncr.20970

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  40 in total

1.  Receptor tyrosine kinase signaling favors a protumorigenic state in breast cancer cells by inhibiting the adaptive immune response.

Authors:  Josie Ursini-Siegel; Sean Cory; Dongmei Zuo; William R Hardy; Elton Rexhepaj; Sonya Lam; Babette Schade; Karin Jirstrom; Eva Bjur; Ciriaco A Piccirillo; David Denardo; Lisa M Coussens; Donal J Brennan; William M Gallagher; Morag Park; Tony Pawson; Michael Hallett; William J Muller
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2010-10-05       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 2.  The role of ErbB3 and its binding partners in breast cancer progression and resistance to hormone and tyrosine kinase directed therapies.

Authors:  Anne W Hamburger
Journal:  J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia       Date:  2008-04-19       Impact factor: 2.673

3.  Protease-activated receptor-2 activation in gastric cancer cells promotes epidermal growth factor receptor trans-activation and proliferation.

Authors:  Roberta Caruso; Francesco Pallone; Daniele Fina; Valentina Gioia; Ilaria Peluso; Flavio Caprioli; Carmine Stolfi; Alessandra Perfetti; Luigi Giusto Spagnoli; Giampiero Palmieri; Thomas T Macdonald; Giovanni Monteleone
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 4.307

4.  Heregulin-dependent delay in mitotic progression requires HER4 and BRCA1.

Authors:  Rebecca S Muraoka-Cook; Laura S Caskey; Melissa A Sandahl; Debra M Hunter; Carty Husted; Karen E Strunk; Carolyn I Sartor; William A Rearick; Wesley McCall; Magdalene K Sgagias; Kenneth H Cowan; H Shelton Earp
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 4.272

Review 5.  ErbB/EGF signaling and EMT in mammary development and breast cancer.

Authors:  Katharine M Hardy; Brian W Booth; Mary J C Hendrix; David S Salomon; Luigi Strizzi
Journal:  J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia       Date:  2010-04-06       Impact factor: 2.673

6.  MicroRNA miR-21 overexpression in human breast cancer is associated with advanced clinical stage, lymph node metastasis and patient poor prognosis.

Authors:  Li-Xu Yan; Xiu-Fang Huang; Qiong Shao; Ma-Yan Huang; Ling Deng; Qiu-Liang Wu; Yi-Xin Zeng; Jian-Yong Shao
Journal:  RNA       Date:  2008-09-23       Impact factor: 4.942

Review 7.  Signal integration: a framework for understanding the efficacy of therapeutics targeting the human EGFR family.

Authors:  H Michael Shepard; Cathleen M Brdlik; Hans Schreiber
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 14.808

8.  Targeting HER2 in breast cancer: overview of long-term experience.

Authors:  Evan Lantz; Ivan Cunningham; Gerald M Higa
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2010-08-09

9.  Inhibition of heregulin mediated MCF-7 breast cancer cell growth by the ErbB3 binding protein EBP1.

Authors:  Yuexing Zhang; Damilola Akinmade; Anne W Hamburger
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  2008-03-19       Impact factor: 8.679

10.  Targeting breast cancer stem cells with HER2-specific antibodies and natural killer cells.

Authors:  Joachim Diessner; Valentin Bruttel; Kathrin Becker; Miriam Pawlik; Roland Stein; Sebastian Häusler; Johannes Dietl; Jörg Wischhusen; Arnd Hönig
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2013-04-03       Impact factor: 6.166

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.