BACKGROUND: The late effects of radiation and chemotherapy increase childhood cancer survivors' risk of chronic health problems. Survivors' behavior is important in modifying this risk, yet adolescent and young adult survivors fail to engage in important health-promoting behaviors and frequently practice high-risk behaviors. This secondary analysis re-evaluated a multi-component behavior-change intervention that had previously demonstrated no impact in adolescent survivors of childhood cancer. PROCEDURE: The parent trial compared 132 adolescent survivors in the intervention arm with 135 in the standard-care arm at baseline and at 1 year for disease and treatment knowledge, perception of late effects risk, and thefrequency of health-risk and health-protective behaviors (combined as a single summative measure). In contrast, the secondary analysis examined each of the 14 behaviors separately. Additionally, an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was conducted to examine the change in health behaviors while statistically controlling for age, gender, and the wide variation in baseline behaviors. RESULTS: Knowledge (P = 0.038), breast self-examination (BSE) (P < or = 0.0001) and testicular self-examination (P = 0.004) increased, as did perceptions about the need to change behavior (P = 0.004) and the effort needed to stay healthy (P < or = 0.0001). In the treatment group, junk food consumption decreased (P = 0.052) and smoking abstinence was maintained (P = 0.088). Significant interactions between gender and treatment group were demonstrated. CONCLUSIONS: Health-risk and health-protective behaviors cannot be effectively combined in a one-dimensional measure. Gender and age influence the impact of interventions targeting health behavior in survivors. Future trials should include observation of the patient-clinician encounter, more complex sampling methods, and pre-trial knowledge of the distribution of the study behaviors.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: The late effects of radiation and chemotherapy increase childhood cancer survivors' risk of chronic health problems. Survivors' behavior is important in modifying this risk, yet adolescent and young adult survivors fail to engage in important health-promoting behaviors and frequently practice high-risk behaviors. This secondary analysis re-evaluated a multi-component behavior-change intervention that had previously demonstrated no impact in adolescent survivors of childhood cancer. PROCEDURE: The parent trial compared 132 adolescent survivors in the intervention arm with 135 in the standard-care arm at baseline and at 1 year for disease and treatment knowledge, perception of late effects risk, and the frequency of health-risk and health-protective behaviors (combined as a single summative measure). In contrast, the secondary analysis examined each of the 14 behaviors separately. Additionally, an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was conducted to examine the change in health behaviors while statistically controlling for age, gender, and the wide variation in baseline behaviors. RESULTS: Knowledge (P = 0.038), breast self-examination (BSE) (P < or = 0.0001) and testicular self-examination (P = 0.004) increased, as did perceptions about the need to change behavior (P = 0.004) and the effort needed to stay healthy (P < or = 0.0001). In the treatment group, junk food consumption decreased (P = 0.052) and smoking abstinence was maintained (P = 0.088). Significant interactions between gender and treatment group were demonstrated. CONCLUSIONS: Health-risk and health-protective behaviors cannot be effectively combined in a one-dimensional measure. Gender and age influence the impact of interventions targeting health behavior in survivors. Future trials should include observation of the patient-clinician encounter, more complex sampling methods, and pre-trial knowledge of the distribution of the study behaviors.
Authors: Lorna Finnegan; Joan L Shaver; Shannon N Zenk; Diana J Wilkie; Carol Estwing Ferrans Journal: Oncol Nurs Forum Date: 2010-11 Impact factor: 2.172
Authors: Darren Mays; Jessica Donze Black; Revonda B Mosher; Aziza T Shad; Kenneth P Tercyak Journal: J Cancer Surviv Date: 2011-02-27 Impact factor: 4.442
Authors: Tara M Brinkman; Christopher J Recklitis; Gisela Michel; Martha A Grootenhuis; James L Klosky Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2018-06-06 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: James L Klosky; Vida L Tyc; Ashley Hum; Shelly Lensing; Joanna Buscemi; Danette M Garces-Webb; Melissa M Hudson Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2009-12-14 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Cheryl L Cox; Melissa M Hudson; Ann Mertens; Kevin Oeffinger; John Whitton; Michele Montgomery; Leslie L Robison Journal: Arch Intern Med Date: 2009-03-09
Authors: Margaret Raber; Maria C Swartz; Diane Santa Maria; Teresia O'Connor; Tom Baranowski; Rhea Li; Joya Chandra Journal: Pediatr Res Date: 2016-04-11 Impact factor: 3.756