Literature DB >> 1577036

Quantitative assessment of aortic regurgitation by magnetic resonance imaging.

S Globits1, H Frank, H Mayr, A Neuhold, D Glogar.   

Abstract

Thirty patients with aortic regurgitation and 10 controls were examined using an 0.5 T superconducting magnet with ECG gating. In each case a multislice-multiphase spinecho study in sagittal-coronal double angulated projection (four-chamber equivalent) was performed to assess left and right ventricular volumes, ejection fraction and regurgitation fraction. Additionally, a blood-flow sensitive cine-study (gradient echo, FAME) was performed to visualize direction and area of regurgitant jet. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data were compared with quantitative and qualitative assessment of aortic regurgitation by angiography, Doppler and colour flow mapping. Using the FAME mode MRI, we were able to detect the regurgitant jet as an area of signal loss within the left ventricle in all patients; moderate correlation to jet area was determined by colour flow mapping (R = 0.60, P less than 0.001). Determination of left and right ventricular end-diastolic, end-systolic and stroke volumes by MRI revealed excellent correlation with invasive data (R = 0.94, P = 0.0001). With MRI regurgitant fraction (RF) could be calculated from the difference between right and left ventricular stroke volumes, which showed good correlation with invasively determined RF (R = 0.91, P = 0.001) and with qualitative Sellers' scoring (R = 0.70, P less than 0.001), respectively. Thus MRI provides the basis for noninvasive detection and quantification of aortic regurgitation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1577036     DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.eurheartj.a060052

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Heart J        ISSN: 0195-668X            Impact factor:   29.983


  5 in total

1.  Direct measurement of aortic regurgitation with phase-contrast magnetic resonance is inaccurate: proposal of an alternative method of quantification.

Authors:  Yoichi Iwamoto; Akio Inage; George Tomlinson; Kyong Jin Lee; Lars Grosse-Wortmann; Mike Seed; Andrea Wan; Shi-Joon Yoo
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2014-06-18

2.  Impact of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging on cardiac device and surgical therapy: a prospective study.

Authors:  Andrew J Taylor; Andris Ellims; Philip J K Lew; Bridie Murphy; Suzana Pally; Sandra Younie
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2013-04-17       Impact factor: 2.357

3.  Holodiastolic Flow Reversal at the Descending Aorta on Cardiac Magnetic Resonance is Neither Sensitive Nor Specific for Significant Aortic Regurgitation in Patients with Congenital Heart Disease.

Authors:  Catherine M Avitabile; Kevin K Whitehead; Mark A Fogel; Daniel W Kim; Timothy S Kim; Julian D Rose; Marc S Keller; Gregory L Fu; Matthew A Harris
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2016-06-16       Impact factor: 1.655

Review 4.  Heart valve disease: investigation by cardiovascular magnetic resonance.

Authors:  Saul G Myerson
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2012-01-19       Impact factor: 5.364

5.  Quantitative evaluation of aortic valve regurgitation in 4D flow cardiac magnetic resonance: at which level should we measure?

Authors:  Malgorzata Polacin; Julia Geiger; Barbara Burkhardt; Fraser M Callaghan; Emanuela Valsangiacomo; Christian Kellenberger
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2022-09-27       Impact factor: 2.795

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.