STUDY DESIGN: A cross-sectional multicenter study was performed to validate the Spanish version of the Scoliosis Research Society-22 (SRS-22) Patient Questionnaire. OBJECTIVES: To determine the construct validity and convergent validity of the instrument. METHODS: The Spanish version of the SRS-22 was given to 175 patients with scoliosis (mean age, 19 years old and 86% women). A subgroup of 31 patients also received the Quality of Life for Spine Deformities Profile (QLSDP). Construct validity was studied by factor analysis. Discriminant validity was assessed analyzing the relation between SRS-22 scores and the variables of deformity severity. Convergent validity as related to the QLSDP was studied with a multitrait-multimethod matrix analysis. RESULTS: Factor analysis offered a solution of four factors coherent with the dimensions of the original instrument. SRS-22 scores were worse in older patients (r = -0.34); patients using analgesics demonstrated lower scores (P < 0.001). Patients treated with a brace had a poorer self-image and were less satisfied with their treatment (P < 0.001) than the other treatment groups. Angular improvement of the curves was associated with better self-image scores (r = 0.34). The SRS-22 and QLSDP demonstrated high correlation coefficients in the convergent validity tests (r = 0.84). CONCLUSION: The Spanish version of the SRS-22 is valid. It has a factorial structure similar to that of the original questionnaire. Moreover, it relates to known severity characteristics of the disease, distinguishes among scoliosis patient groups, and shows concordant values with another valid instrument for measuring self-perceived health.
STUDY DESIGN: A cross-sectional multicenter study was performed to validate the Spanish version of the Scoliosis Research Society-22 (SRS-22) Patient Questionnaire. OBJECTIVES: To determine the construct validity and convergent validity of the instrument. METHODS: The Spanish version of the SRS-22 was given to 175 patients with scoliosis (mean age, 19 years old and 86% women). A subgroup of 31 patients also received the Quality of Life for Spine Deformities Profile (QLSDP). Construct validity was studied by factor analysis. Discriminant validity was assessed analyzing the relation between SRS-22 scores and the variables of deformity severity. Convergent validity as related to the QLSDP was studied with a multitrait-multimethod matrix analysis. RESULTS: Factor analysis offered a solution of four factors coherent with the dimensions of the original instrument. SRS-22 scores were worse in older patients (r = -0.34); patients using analgesics demonstrated lower scores (P < 0.001). Patients treated with a brace had a poorer self-image and were less satisfied with their treatment (P < 0.001) than the other treatment groups. Angular improvement of the curves was associated with better self-image scores (r = 0.34). The SRS-22 and QLSDP demonstrated high correlation coefficients in the convergent validity tests (r = 0.84). CONCLUSION: The Spanish version of the SRS-22 is valid. It has a factorial structure similar to that of the original questionnaire. Moreover, it relates to known severity characteristics of the disease, distinguishes among scoliosispatient groups, and shows concordant values with another valid instrument for measuring self-perceived health.
Authors: Sayf S A Faraj; Miranda L van Hooff; Roderick M Holewijn; David W Polly; Tsjitske M Haanstra; Marinus de Kleuver Journal: Eur Spine J Date: 2017-05-22 Impact factor: 3.134
Authors: Marco Monticone; Claudia Nava; Vittorio Leggero; Barbara Rocca; Stefano Salvaderi; Simona Ferrante; Emilia Ambrosini Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2015-02-15 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Eveline M Bunge; Rikard E Juttmann; Marinus de Kleuver; Frans C van Biezen; Harry J de Koning Journal: Eur Spine J Date: 2006-04-12 Impact factor: 3.134
Authors: A F Mannion; A Elfering; J Bago; F Pellise; A Vila-Casademunt; S Richner-Wunderlin; M Domingo-Sàbat; I Obeid; E Acaroglu; A Alanay; F S Pérez-Grueso; C R Baldus; L Y Carreon; K H Bridwell; S D Glassman; F Kleinstück Journal: Eur Spine J Date: 2017-09-02 Impact factor: 3.134
Authors: Tobias L Schulte; Meinald T Thielsch; Georg Gosheger; Patrick Boertz; Jan Henrik Terheyden; Mark Wetterkamp Journal: Eur Spine J Date: 2017-09-09 Impact factor: 3.134
Authors: M Potoupnis; K Papavasiliou; E Kenanidis; S Pellios; A Kapetanou; F Sayegh; G Kapetanos Journal: Hippokratia Date: 2012-07 Impact factor: 0.471
Authors: Daniel Pérez-Prieto; Juan Francisco Sánchez-Soler; Juana Martínez-Llorens; Sergi Mojal; Joan Bagó; Enric Cáceres; Manuel Ramírez Journal: Eur Spine J Date: 2014-07-31 Impact factor: 3.134