Literature DB >> 1576890

One or multiple samplings for flow cytometric DNA analyses in breast cancer-prognostic implications?

M Fernö1, B Baldetorp, S B Ewers, I Idvall, H Olsson, H Sigurdsson, D Killander.   

Abstract

Flow cytometric assessments of DNA ploidy status and the S-phase fraction (SPF) have been shown to yield prognostic information in breast cancer. The aim of the present investigation was to elucidate the reproducibility of results with regard to tumor DNA heterogeneity, and to ascertain whether the prognostic value of DNA measurements might be enhanced by analyzing two pieces of a tumor instead of one. Agreement with regard to ploidy status (diploid versus non-diploid) was obtained in 90% of cases (71/79) when two adjacent sections of the tumor were investigated, and in 77% of cases (10/13) when four biopsies from different quadrants of the tumor specimen were investigated. The corresponding figures for agreement in SPF (divided into three categories, less than 7.0%, 7.0-11.9%, and greater than or equal to 12%) were 75% (59/79; 2-sample series) and 55% (7/13; 4-biopsy series). The main reason for variance in ploidy results was the difficulties in distinguishing near diploid cell populations. Discrepancies in SPF categories could be explained by minor fluctuations in SPF values near the cut-off levels, or by variance in ploidy status, the fraction of non-diploid nuclei, and background noise due to cell debris. There was a stepwise increase in recurrence rate (RR) among patients with increasing SPF category (RR: 20%, 41%, and 53%). Patients whose SPF categories varied, from low or intermediate in one part of the tumor to high in another, seemed to have a poor prognosis (RR = 57%).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1576890     DOI: 10.1002/cyto.990130305

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cytometry        ISSN: 0196-4763


  5 in total

1.  Tumour heterogeneity of DNA cell cycle variables in breast cancer measured by flow cytometry.

Authors:  E Bergers; P J van Diest; J P Baak
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 2.  DNA Cytometry Consensus Conference. Consensus review of the clinical utility of DNA cytometry in carcinoma of the breast.

Authors:  D W Hedley; G M Clark; C J Cornelisse; D Killander; T Kute; D Merkel
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 4.872

3.  Complex karyotypes in flow cytometrically DNA-diploid squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck.

Authors:  J Akervall; Y Jin; B Baldetorp; F Mertens; J Wennerberg
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 7.640

4.  Heterogeneity in renal cell carcinoma and its impact no prognosis--a flow cytometric study.

Authors:  B Ljungberg; C Mehle; R Stenling; G Roos
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 7.640

5.  Progression and survival in prostatic adenocarcinoma: a comparison of clinical stage, Gleason grade, S-phase fraction and DNA ploidy.

Authors:  S Vesalainen; S Nordling; P Lipponen; M Talja; K Syrjänen
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 7.640

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.