Literature DB >> 15768863

Molar gestations and hydropic abortions differentiated by p57 immunostaining.

Rita L Romaguera1, Maria M Rodriguez, Jocelyn H Bruce, Tania Zuluaga, Ana Viciana, Manuel A Penalver, Nadji Mehrdad.   

Abstract

Classification of molar gestations into complete and partial and their differentiation from hydropic abortions traditionally are accomplished by morphology alone. The process sometimes may be inaccurate or inconclusive. With the availability of p57 immunostaining it may be possible to objectively classify these lesions. We used p57 for the differential diagnosis of hydropic abortions and molar gestations and correlated the findings with the clinical outcome of patients in each category. First, 86 cases were originally classified by histomorphology into hydropic abortion (42) and molar gestations (23 complete and 21partial). Based on the pattern of p57 staining the cases were reclassified into 45 hydropic abortions, 15 partial moles and 26 complete moles (3 cases with previous diagnosis of complete mole based on morphology were reclassified as hydropic abortion). Clinical follow-ups ranged from 6-24 months and showed persistent trophoblastic disease in 8 cases (31%) of complete moles and 3 cases (20%) of partial moles (p = 0.47). No hydropic abortion cases demonstrated persistent trophoblastic disease. One patient with partial mole developed choriocarcinoma. This study confirms that p57 objectively distinguishes hydropic abortions from molar gestations (partial and complete moles). This differentiation is clinically relevant since patients with hydropic abortions do not need to be followed while patients with molar gestations do.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15768863     DOI: 10.1080/15227950490890351

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fetal Pediatr Pathol        ISSN: 1551-3815            Impact factor:   0.958


  3 in total

1.  Diagnostic reproducibility of hydatidiform moles: ancillary techniques (p57 immunohistochemistry and molecular genotyping) improve morphologic diagnosis.

Authors:  Russell Vang; Mamta Gupta; Lee-Shu-Fune Wu; Anna V Yemelyanova; Robert J Kurman; Kathleen M Murphy; Cheryl Descipio; Brigitte M Ronnett
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 6.394

2.  Diagnostic reproducibility of hydatidiform moles: ancillary techniques (p57 immunohistochemistry and molecular genotyping) improve morphologic diagnosis for both recently trained and experienced gynecologic pathologists.

Authors:  Mamta Gupta; Russell Vang; Anna V Yemelyanova; Robert J Kurman; Fanghong Rose Li; Emily C Maambo; Kathleen M Murphy; Cheryl DeScipio; Carol B Thompson; Brigitte M Ronnett
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 6.394

3.  Challenges in the Routine Praxis Diagnosis of Hydatidiform Mole: a Tertiary Health Center Experience.

Authors:  Melisa Lelic; Zlatan Fatusic; Ermina Iljazovic; Suada Ramic; Sergije Markovic; Selma Alicelebic
Journal:  Med Arch       Date:  2017-08
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.