Literature DB >> 15768181

Preoperative intensive, community-based vs. traditional stoma education: a randomized, controlled trial.

Sanjay Chaudhri1, Lesley Brown, Imran Hassan, Alan F Horgan.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Conventional practice in colorectal surgery involves stoma education being imparted postoperatively. Proficiency in stoma management often delays patients' discharge following colorectal surgery. The aim of this randomized, controlled trial was to compare preoperative intensive, community-based stoma education with conventional postoperative stoma education after elective colorectal surgery.
METHODS: Forty-two elective colorectal patients requiring a stoma were randomized into an intensive preoperative teaching (study) or postoperative (control) group. Intervention for the study group included two preoperative visits in the community during which patients were taught with audiovisual aids to use and change the stoma pouching system. Goal-directed postoperative stoma education was standardized for both groups. Outcomes measured included time to stoma proficiency, postoperative hospital stay, unplanned stoma-related interventions in the community within six weeks of discharge, and preoperative and postoperative hospital anxiety and depression scores. Cost-effectiveness of the intervention was also evaluated.
RESULTS: All outcomes measured were improved in the study group, including time to stoma proficiency (5.5 vs. 9 days; P = 0.0005), hospital stay (8 vs. 10 days; P = 0.029), and unplanned stoma-related community interventions per patient (median 0 vs. 0.5; P = 0.0309). No adverse effects of the intervention were noted. The average cost saving per patient was pound 1,119 (dollar 2,104) for the study group compared with the control group.
CONCLUSIONS: Stoma education is more effective if undertaken in the preoperative setting. It results in shorter times to stoma proficiency and earlier discharge from the hospital. It also reduces stoma-related interventions in the community and has no adverse effects on patient well-being.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15768181     DOI: 10.1007/s10350-004-0897-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  27 in total

Review 1.  Enhanced recovery programmes for patients undergoing radical cystectomy.

Authors:  Julian Smith; Raj S Pruthi; John McGrath
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2014-07-15       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 2.  Essential Elements for Enhanced Recovery After Intra-abdominal Surgery.

Authors:  Amir Elhassan; Ihab Elhassan; Amjad Elhassan; Krish D Sekar; Ryan E Rubin; Richard D Urman; Elyse M Cornett; Alan David Kaye
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2019-03-11

3.  Clinical practice guideline for enhanced recovery after colon and rectal surgery from the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons (ASCRS) and Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES).

Authors:  Joseph C Carmichael; Deborah S Keller; Gabriele Baldini; Liliana Bordeianou; Eric Weiss; Lawrence Lee; Marylise Boutros; James McClane; Scott R Steele; Liane S Feldman
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-08-03       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4.  [Short version of the German S3 guideline for bladder cancer].

Authors:  M Retz; J E Gschwend; P Maisch
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 0.639

5.  The effect of preoperative stoma training for patients undergoing colorectal surgery in an enhanced recovery programme.

Authors:  M J Hughes; W Cunningham; S Yalamarthi
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2019-12-16       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 6.  Avoidance and management of stomal complications.

Authors:  Michael Kwiatt; Michitaka Kawata
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2013-06

7.  Compliance with enhanced recovery protocols in elderly patients undergoing colorectal resection.

Authors:  S Hallam; F Rickard; N Reeves; D Messenger; J Shabbir
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2018-06-18       Impact factor: 1.891

8.  A defunctioning stoma significantly prolongs the length of stay in laparoscopic colorectal resection.

Authors:  Mark T Cartmell; Oliver M Jones; B J Moran; T D Cecil
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-02-23       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Recommendations for the improvement of bladder cancer quality of care in Canada: A consensus document reviewed and endorsed by Bladder Cancer Canada (BCC), Canadian Urologic Oncology Group (CUOG), and Canadian Urological Association (CUA), December 2015.

Authors:  Wassim Kassouf; Armen Aprikian; Peter Black; Girish Kulkarni; Jonathan Izawa; Libni Eapen; Adrian Fairey; Alan So; Scott North; Ricardo Rendon; Srikala S Sridhar; Tarik Alam; Fadi Brimo; Normand Blais; Chris Booth; Joseph Chin; Peter Chung; Darrel Drachenberg; Yves Fradet; Michael Jewett; Ron Moore; Chris Morash; Bobby Shayegan; Geoffrey Gotto; Neil Fleshner; Fred Saad; D Robert Siemens
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2016-02-08       Impact factor: 1.862

10.  Stoma issues in the obese patient.

Authors:  Sandra J Beck
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2011-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.