Literature DB >> 15768100

Influence of stocking density on the performance, carcass characteristics and selected welfare indicators of broiler chickens.

D G Thomas1, V Ravindran, D V Thomas, B J Camden, Y H Cottam, P C H Morel, C J Cook.   

Abstract

AIM: To compare the effects of four stocking densities (5, 10, 15 or 20 birds per m2) on the performance, carcass characteristics and selected welfare indicators of broiler chickens.
METHODS: A total of 756 day-old male broiler chicks were assigned as six replicates of 13, 25, 38 and 50 birds per pen, to stocking densities of 2,000, 1,000, 667 and 500 cm2 floor space per bird, respectively. The birds were housed in floor pens in an environmentally controlled room. Normal commercial diets were fed ad libitum and fresh water was freely available throughout the 5-week study period. Liveweights of birds and feed intake were recorded at weekly intervals. Data on carcass parameters and welfare indicators (moisture, gait scores, feather scores, breast and hip lesions, and foot pad and hock burns) were obtained on Day 35. Adrenal glands were removed at slaughter, weighed and examined histologically to determine the total proportion of cortical and medullary tissues.
RESULTS: During the study, the birds at the lowest density grew faster (p<0.001-0.01) and consumed more (p<0.001- 0.01) feed than those at the other three stocking densities. The liveweight gains and feed intake of birds reared at densities of 10, 15 and 20 birds per m2 were similar (p=0.11-0.83 and p=0.17-0.57, respectively). Stocking density had no influence on the feed/weight gain, mortality or carcass characteristics. No breast or hip lesions were observed in carcasses from any of the groups. The weight and structure of the adrenal glands were similar across all groups although the staining of medullary tissue of birds was most intense in the highest stocking density group. As stocking density increased, so did moisture and gait score, hock and foot pad burn scores, and the feather score was adversely affected.
CONCLUSIONS: The data showed that the relationship between stocking density and productivity traits was not linear in nature, in accordance with other studies. Under the conditions of the current study, the performance, mortality and carcass characteristics of broilers grown at densities of 10, 15 and 20 birds per m2 were similar. There were some welfare implications at high population densities as indicated by adverse effects on litter quality, gait scores and the incidence of hock and foot pad burns.

Entities:  

Year:  2004        PMID: 15768100     DOI: 10.1080/00480169.2004.36408

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Z Vet J        ISSN: 0048-0169            Impact factor:   1.628


  16 in total

1.  Responses of male broiler chickens from two genetic groups to different stocking densities in a semi-arid subtropical environment.

Authors:  Kow Benyi; Owoahene Acheampong-Boateng; Kgabo T Mahlako
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2011-06-08       Impact factor: 1.559

2.  Supplemental methionine and stocking density affect antioxidant status, fatty acid profiles, and growth performance of broiler chickens.

Authors:  Andrew D Magnuson; Guanchen Liu; Tao Sun; Samar A Tolba; Lin Xi; Rose Whelan; Xin Gen Lei
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 3.159

3.  Effects of dietary tryptophan and stocking density on the performance, meat quality, and metabolic status of broilers.

Authors:  Bo Wang; Zhizhi Min; Jianmin Yuan; Bingkun Zhang; Yuming Guo
Journal:  J Anim Sci Biotechnol       Date:  2014-09-26

4.  Immune neuroendocrine phenotypes in Coturnix coturnix: do avian species show LEWIS/FISCHER-like profiles?

Authors:  F Nicolas Nazar; Bibiana E Barrios; Pete Kaiser; Raul H Marin; Silvia G Correa
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-20       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Comparisons of management practices and farm design on Australian commercial layer and meat chicken farms: Cage, barn and free range.

Authors:  Angela Bullanday Scott; Mini Singh; Jenny-Ann Toribio; Marta Hernandez-Jover; Belinda Barnes; Kathryn Glass; Barbara Moloney; Amanda Lee; Peter Groves
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-11-22       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Assessing the Effects of Stocking Density on Turkey Tom Health and Welfare to 16 Weeks of Age.

Authors:  Kailyn Beaulac; Karen Schwean-Lardner
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2018-09-04

7.  The influence of environmental enrichment and stocking density on the plumage and health conditions of laying hen pullets.

Authors:  Christopher J Liebers; Angela Schwarzer; Michael Erhard; Paul Schmidt; Helen Louton
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2019-06-01       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  Effect of stocking density and alpha-lipoic acid on the growth performance, physiological and oxidative stress and immune response of broilers.

Authors:  Wenjia Li; Fengxian Wei; Bin Xu; Quanyou Sun; Wen Deng; Huihui Ma; Jie Bai; Shaoyu Li
Journal:  Asian-Australas J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-04-15       Impact factor: 2.509

9.  Effect of Different Flooring Designs on the Performance and Foot Pad Health in Broilers and Turkeys.

Authors:  Bussarakam Chuppava; Christian Visscher; Josef Kamphues
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2018-05-03       Impact factor: 2.752

10.  Reducing Stress Susceptibility of Broiler Chickens by Supplementing a Yeast Fermentation Product in the Feed or Drinking Water.

Authors:  Jill R Nelson; Don R McIntyre; Hilary O Pavlidis; Gregory S Archer
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2018-10-04       Impact factor: 2.752

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.