Literature DB >> 15767730

Pancreatectomy using the no-touch isolation technique followed by extensive intraoperative peritoneal lavage to prevent cancer cell dissemination: a pilot study.

Masahiko Hirota1, Shinya Shimada, Kenichiro Yamamoto, Eiji Tanaka, Hiroki Sugita, Hiroshi Egami, Michio Ogawa.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: In pancreatic cancer, even for patients who have undergone curative resection (R0), survival analysis has revealed a poor survival rate due to cancer recurrence. Because the operation itself might have caused the dissemination of these cancer cells, the no-touch isolation technique and extensive intraoperative peritoneal lavage may be a potential operative procedure for improving the outcome. PATIENTS: Eight patients treated by the no-touch isolation technique were compared with 10 patients treated using conventional techniques. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Cancer cell detection rates in the portal venous blood, frequency of recurrence, and survival rate. We also analyzed the lymphatic fluid squeezed from the resected cancerous pancreatic tissue.
RESULTS: In 5 out of 10 cases (50%) in the conventional procedure group, CEA mRNA was identified in the portal blood after tumor manipulation, while only 1 out of 8 cases (13%) in the no-touch isolation technique group was positive for portal CEA mRNA. All lymphatic fluid samples squeezed from the resected cancerous pancreatic tissue were positive (8/8) for CEA mRNA. The recurrence rate was 90% (9/10) in the conventional procedure group, and 38% (3/8) in the no-touch isolation technique group (P=0.043). In the conventional procedure group, hepatic metastasis, local recurrence, peritoneal dissemination, and extraabdominal recurrence were identified in 6 (60%), 4 (40%), 4 (40%), and 2 patients (20%), respectively. On the other hand, among the no-touch isolation technique group, recurrence was identified in 1 (13%), 1 (13%), 0 (0%), and 1 patient (13%), respectively. There was no peritoneal dissemination along with the decreased hepatic recurrence rate. Mean (+/-SEM) survival time was 21.2+/-5.8 months for the conventional procedure group and 41.5+/-5.6 months for the no-touch isolation technique group (P=0.018). The 3-year survival rate was 12.5+/-11.5% for the conventional procedure group and 75.0+/-21.7% for the no-touch isolation technique group.
CONCLUSION: This study presented the potential of cancer dissemination during the intraoperative manipulation of tumors and its contribution to cancer recurrence, as well as the significance of the no-touch isolation technique and extensive intraoperative peritoneal lavage for pancreatic cancer surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15767730

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JOP        ISSN: 1590-8577


  7 in total

1.  Prospective nonrandomized comparison between pylorus-preserving and subtotal stomach-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy from the perspectives of DGE occurrence and postoperative digestive functions.

Authors:  Emi Akizuki; Yasutoshi Kimura; Takayuki Nobuoka; Masafumi Imamura; Toshihiko Nishidate; Toru Mizuguchi; Tomohisa Furuhata; Koichi Hirata
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2008-04-22       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 2.  A meta-analysis of extended versus standard lymphadenectomy in patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Lorenzo A Orci; Jeremy Meyer; Christophe Combescure; Leo Bühler; Thierry Berney; Philippe Morel; Christian Toso
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2015-04-23       Impact factor: 3.647

Review 3.  No-touch isolation techniques for pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Tamotsu Kuroki; Susumu Eguchi
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2016-03-01       Impact factor: 2.549

4.  Predictive risk factors for peritoneal recurrence after pancreatic cancer resection and strategies for its prevention.

Authors:  Kyohei Ariake; Fuyuhiko Motoi; Hideo Ohtsuka; Koji Fukase; Kunihiro Masuda; Masamichi Mizuma; Hiroki Hayashi; Kei Nakagawa; Takanori Morikawa; Shimpei Maeda; Tatsuyuki Takadate; Takeshi Naitoh; Shinichi Egawa; Michiaki Unno
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2017-04-22       Impact factor: 2.549

5.  KRAS mutations in cell-free DNA from preoperative and postoperative sera as a pancreatic cancer marker: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Yutaka Nakano; Minoru Kitago; Sachiko Matsuda; Yuki Nakamura; Yusuke Fujita; Shunichi Imai; Masahiro Shinoda; Hiroshi Yagi; Yuta Abe; Taizo Hibi; Yoko Fujii-Nishimura; Ayano Takeuchi; Yutaka Endo; Osamu Itano; Yuko Kitagawa
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2018-01-23       Impact factor: 7.640

6.  A new surgical technique of pancreaticoduodenectomy with splenic artery resection for ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head and/or body invading splenic artery: impact of the balance between surgical radicality and QOL to avoid total pancreatectomy.

Authors:  Ryosuke Desaki; Shugo Mizuno; Akihiro Tanemura; Masashi Kishiwada; Yasuhiro Murata; Yoshinori Azumi; Naohisa Kuriyama; Masanobu Usui; Hiroyuki Sakurai; Masami Tabata; Shuji Isaji
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-06-12       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 7.  Circulating Tumor Cells and the Non-Touch Isolation Technique in Surgery for Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Adachi; Hiroyuki Ito; Noriyoshi Sawabata
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-11       Impact factor: 6.639

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.