Literature DB >> 15767349

Trends in cervical squamous cell carcinoma incidence in 13 European countries: changing risk and the effects of screening.

Freddie Bray1, Anja H Loos, Peter McCarron, Elizabete Weiderpass, Mark Arbyn, Henrik Møller, Matti Hakama, D Max Parkin.   

Abstract

Despite there being sufficient evidence for the effectiveness of screening by cytology in preventing cancer of the cervix uteri, screening policies vary widely among European countries, and incidence is increasing in younger women. This study analyzes trends in squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the cervix uteri in 13 European countries to evaluate effectiveness of screening against a background of changing risk. Age-period-cohort models were fitted and period and cohort effects were estimated; these were considered as primarily indicative of screening interventions and changing etiology, respectively. A unique set of estimates was derived by fixing age slopes to one of several plausible age curves under the assumption that the relation between age and cervical cancer incidence is biologically determined. There were period-specific declines in cervical SCC in several countries, with the largest decreases seen in northern Europe. A pattern emerged across Europe of escalating risk in successive generations born after 1930. In the western European countries, a decrease followed by a stabilization of risk by cohort was accompanied by period-specific declines. In southern Europe, stable period, but increasing cohort trends, were observed. Substantial changes have occurred in cervical SCC incidence in Europe and well-organized screening programs have been highly effective in reducing the incidence of cervical SCC. Screening and changing sexual mores largely explain the changing period- and cohort-specific patterns, respectively. The increasing risk in recent cohorts is of obvious concern particularly in countries where no screening programs are in place. Further investigation of the effectiveness of opportunistic screening is warranted as is the observation of differing risk patterns in young cohorts in countries with relatively similar societal structures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15767349     DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-04-0569

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.254


  73 in total

1.  Trends in cervical cancer incidence and mortality in Poland: is there an impact of the introduction of the organised screening?

Authors:  Andrzej Nowakowski; Urszula Wojciechowska; Paulina Wieszczy; Marek Cybulski; Michał F Kamiński; Joanna Didkowska
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2017-08-05       Impact factor: 8.082

Review 2.  Deciphering the cells of origin of squamous cell carcinomas.

Authors:  Adriana Sánchez-Danés; Cédric Blanpain
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 60.716

3.  Prevalence and correlates of cervical abnormalities among female sex workers in Tijuana, Mexico.

Authors:  Claire C Bristow; Brandon Brown; Logan Marg; Raquel I Iñiguez; Kristen Meckel-Parker; Jay G Silverman; Carlos Magis-Rodriguez; Tommi L Gaines; Kimberly C Brouwer
Journal:  Int J STD AIDS       Date:  2019-06-03       Impact factor: 1.359

4.  High-grade cervical lesions among women attending a reference clinic in Brazil: associated factors and comparison among screening methods.

Authors:  Neide T Boldrini; Luciana B Freitas; Amanda R Coutinho; Flavia Z Loureiro; Liliana C Spano; Angélica E Miranda
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-07-11       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Changes in prevalence and clinical characteristics of cervical cancer in the People's Republic of China: a study of 10,012 cases from a nationwide working group.

Authors:  Shuang Li; Ting Hu; Weiguo Lv; Hang Zhou; Xiong Li; Ru Yang; Yao Jia; Kecheng Huang; Zhilan Chen; Shaoshuai Wang; Fangxu Tang; Qinghua Zhang; Jian Shen; Jin Zhou; Ling Xi; Dongrui Deng; Hui Wang; Shixuan Wang; Xing Xie; Ding Ma
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2013-09-16

6.  Characterization of Molecular Markers Indicative of Cervical Cancer Progression.

Authors:  Hilal Arnouk; Mark A Merkley; Robert H Podolsky; Hubert Stöppler; Carlos Santos; Manuel Alvarez; Julio Mariategui; Daron Ferris; Jeffrey R Lee; William S Dynan
Journal:  Proteomics Clin Appl       Date:  2009-05-05       Impact factor: 3.494

7.  Cytological surveillance compared with immediate referral for colposcopy in management of women with low grade cervical abnormalities: multicentre randomised controlled trial.

Authors: 
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2009-07-28

8.  Long-term follow-up of cervical disease in women screened by cytology and HPV testing: results from the HART study.

Authors:  D Mesher; A Szarewski; L Cadman; H Cubie; H Kitchener; D Luesley; U Menon; G Hulman; M Desai; L Ho; G Terry; A Williams; P Sasieni; J Cuzick
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2010-03-30       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  Comparison of Hybrid capture 2 testing at different thresholds with cytology as primary cervical screening test.

Authors:  D C Rijkaart; V M H Coupe; F J van Kemenade; D A M Heideman; A T Hesselink; W Verweij; L Rozendaal; R H Verheijen; P J Snijders; J Berkhof; C J L M Meijer
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2010-08-31       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Effectiveness of cervical screening with age: population based case-control study of prospectively recorded data.

Authors:  Peter Sasieni; Alejandra Castanon; Jack Cuzick
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2009-07-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.