Literature DB >> 15767240

Barriers to patient self-testing of prothrombin time: national survey of anticoagulation practitioners.

Ann K Wittkowsky1, Colleen M Sekreta, Edith A Nutescu, Jack Ansell.   

Abstract

Oral anticoagulation with warfarin requires routine monitoring of prothrombin time, expressed as the international normalized ratio (INR). Patient self-testing for INR is common in Europe but not in the United States. In order to determine the frequency of INR self-testing among patients whose anticoagulant therapy is managed in U.S. anticoagulation clinics, to describe the processes that support this self-testing, and to identify the barriers as experienced by anticoagulation clinic providers, a three-part survey was mailed to 538 anticoagulation specialists in the United States. The response rate was 43.7%. Policies and procedures of almost 60% of anticoagulation clinics prohibited INR self-testing for enrolled patients. In addition, less than 1% of patients being managed by U.S. anticoagulation clinics use self-testing to obtain INR results. Primary barriers were the cost of self-testing instruments (78.7% of respondents), cost of reagent cartridges (60.4%), and fear that self-testing might lead to unintended self-management (35.7%). Over 75% of respondents believed that some reimbursement for the cost of self-testing devices and supplies would increase the likelihood that anticoagulation clinics would recommend INR self-testing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15767240     DOI: 10.1592/phco.25.2.265.56949

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacotherapy        ISSN: 0277-0008            Impact factor:   4.705


  14 in total

1.  Incorporating patient self-testing into your practice.

Authors:  Diane Wirth
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2007-09-29       Impact factor: 2.300

2.  Patient barriers and solutions for INR self-testing.

Authors:  Nancy L Shapiro
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2007-09-27       Impact factor: 2.300

3.  Patient self-testing for management of anticoagulation therapy: challenges.

Authors:  Mark W Wurster
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2007-09-27       Impact factor: 2.300

4.  Is patient self-testing a good thing?

Authors:  Lynn B Oertel; Edward N Libby
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 2.300

5.  Two monitoring methods of oral anticoagulant therapy in patients with mechanical heart valve prothesis: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Zhe Xu; Zhiping Wang; Jingsong Ou; Yingqi Xu; Song Yang; Xi Zhang
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 2.300

6.  The cost effectiveness of anticoagulation management services for patients with atrial fibrillation and at high risk of stroke in the US.

Authors:  Patrick W Sullivan; Thomas W Arant; Samuel L Ellis; Heather Ulrich
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 7.  Warfarin therapy: in need of improvement after all these years.

Authors:  Stephen E Kimmel
Journal:  Expert Opin Pharmacother       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 3.889

8.  Fully printed prothrombin time sensor for point-of-care testing.

Authors:  Nicholas X Williams; Brittani Carroll; Steven G Noyce; Hansel Alex Hobbie; Daniel Y Joh; Joseph G Rogers; Aaron D Franklin
Journal:  Biosens Bioelectron       Date:  2020-10-26       Impact factor: 10.618

9.  Practice nursed-based, individual and video-assisted patient education in oral anticoagulation--protocol of a cluster-randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Thanh Duc Hua; Stefan Viktor Vormfelde; Manar Abu Abed; Hannelore Schneider-Rudt; Petra Sobotta; Tim Friede; Jean-François Chenot
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2011-04-10       Impact factor: 2.497

10.  Point-of-Care International Normalized Ratio (INR) Monitoring Devices for Patients on Long-term Oral Anticoagulation Therapy: An Evidence-Based Analysis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2009-09-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.