OBJECTIVE: To review available data regarding the efficacy of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) for the treatment of infections caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). DATA SOURCES: A MEDLINE search was performed (January 1966-December 2003) using the search terms Staphylococcus aureus , sulfamethoxazole, trimethoprim, co-trimoxazole, and methicillin resistance. Abstracts from infectious diseases meetings also were reviewed. DATA SYNTHESIS: The reported rate of TMP-SMX resistance in S. aureus is highly variable. From a mechanistic standpoint, TMP-SMX resistance among MRSA appears to be distinct from multidrug resistance, although some anecdotal reports suggest otherwise. Clonal outbreaks of MRSA resistant to TMP-SMX have been described; of these, the Brazilian clone has more often been resistant to TMP-SMX than the Iberian clone. Rates of TMP-SMX resistance are particularly high in institutions serving large numbers of patients infected by the human immunodeficiency virus, due to increased exposure for Pneumocystis prophylaxis. Limited studies and case reports have found TMP-SMX useful against infections caused by MRSA. CONCLUSIONS: A large body of anecdotal data, but only one randomized clinical trial, indicates the effectiveness of TMP-SMX as a treatment for MRSA infections. Double-blind, randomized controlled trials are needed to compare the two available oral agents-TMP-SMX and linezolid-against MRSA.
OBJECTIVE: To review available data regarding the efficacy of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) for the treatment of infections caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). DATA SOURCES: A MEDLINE search was performed (January 1966-December 2003) using the search terms Staphylococcus aureus , sulfamethoxazole, trimethoprim, co-trimoxazole, and methicillin resistance. Abstracts from infectious diseases meetings also were reviewed. DATA SYNTHESIS: The reported rate of TMP-SMX resistance in S. aureus is highly variable. From a mechanistic standpoint, TMP-SMX resistance among MRSA appears to be distinct from multidrug resistance, although some anecdotal reports suggest otherwise. Clonal outbreaks of MRSA resistant to TMP-SMX have been described; of these, the Brazilian clone has more often been resistant to TMP-SMX than the Iberian clone. Rates of TMP-SMX resistance are particularly high in institutions serving large numbers of patients infected by the human immunodeficiency virus, due to increased exposure for Pneumocystis prophylaxis. Limited studies and case reports have found TMP-SMX useful against infections caused by MRSA. CONCLUSIONS: A large body of anecdotal data, but only one randomized clinical trial, indicates the effectiveness of TMP-SMX as a treatment for MRSA infections. Double-blind, randomized controlled trials are needed to compare the two available oral agents-TMP-SMX and linezolid-against MRSA.
Authors: F P N Mollema; J A Severin; J L Nouwen; A Ott; H A Verbrugh; M C Vos Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2010-06-14 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Mary Jo Cenizal; Daniel Skiest; Samuel Luber; Roger Bedimo; Pat Davis; Patrick Fox; Kathleen Delaney; R Doug Hardy Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2007-05-14 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Christina R Bourne; Nancy Wakeham; Richard A Bunce; Baskar Nammalwar; K Darrell Berlin; William W Barrow Journal: J Mol Recognit Date: 2012-04 Impact factor: 2.137
Authors: Sam Ogwang; Hoa T Nguyen; Marissa Sherman; Saralee Bajaksouzian; Michael R Jacobs; W Henry Boom; Guo-Fang Zhang; Liem Nguyen Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2011-03-03 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: C R Bourne; E W Barrow; R A Bunce; P C Bourne; K D Berlin; W W Barrow Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2010-07-06 Impact factor: 5.191