Literature DB >> 15766847

Adverse effects of environmental noise on acoustic voice quality measurements.

Dimitar D Deliyski1, Heather S Shaw, Maegan K Evans.   

Abstract

An accurate analysis of voice quality is imperative when using acoustic measurements to diagnose vocal pathologies. It is known that noise has a significant effect on the reliability and validity of acoustic voice measurements, but the precise relationship has not been established. The purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of noise on the accuracy, reliability, and validity of acoustic voice quality measurements while balancing for gender, age, intersubject and intrasubject variability, microphones, computer hardware, analysis software, and type of noise. Level of noise was precisely controlled. The specific focus of interest was to determine the critical levels of noise that can invalidate voice quality measurements and to generate practical recommendations. Results suggest that the recommended, acceptable, and unacceptable levels of noise in the acoustic environment are above 42 dB, above 30 dB, and below 30 dB signal-to-noise ratio, respectively.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15766847     DOI: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2004.07.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Voice        ISSN: 0892-1997            Impact factor:   2.009


  16 in total

1.  Vowel selection and its effects on perturbation and nonlinear dynamic measures.

Authors:  Julia K Maccallum; Yu Zhang; Jack J Jiang
Journal:  Folia Phoniatr Logop       Date:  2010-10-08       Impact factor: 0.849

2.  Effects of low-pass filtering on acoustic analysis of voice.

Authors:  Julia K MacCallum; Aleksandra E Olszewski; Yu Zhang; Jack J Jiang
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2010-03-25       Impact factor: 2.009

3.  Acoustic Properties of Cries in 12-Month Old Infants at High-Risk of Autism Spectrum Disorder.

Authors:  Lisa M Unwin; Ildiko Bruz; Murray T Maybery; Victoria Reynolds; Natalie Ciccone; Cheryl Dissanayake; Martha Hickey; Andrew J O Whitehouse
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2017-07

4.  Refining algorithmic estimation of relative fundamental frequency: Accounting for sample characteristics and fundamental frequency estimation method.

Authors:  Jennifer M Vojtech; Roxanne K Segina; Daniel P Buckley; Katharine R Kolin; Monique C Tardif; J Pieter Noordzij; Cara E Stepp
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Reproducibility of Voice Parameters: The Effect of Room Acoustics and Microphones.

Authors:  Pasquale Bottalico; Juliana Codino; Lady Catherine Cantor-Cutiva; Katherine Marks; Charles J Nudelman; Jean Skeffington; Rahul Shrivastav; Maria Cristina Jackson-Menaldi; Eric J Hunter; Adam D Rubin
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2018-11-22       Impact factor: 2.009

6.  Standardization of pitch-range settings in voice acoustic analysis.

Authors:  Adam P Vogel; Paul Maruff; Peter J Snyder; James C Mundt
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2009-05

7.  Accuracy of Acoustic Measures of Voice via Telepractice Videoconferencing Platforms.

Authors:  Hasini R Weerathunge; Roxanne K Segina; Lauren Tracy; Cara E Stepp
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2021-06-22       Impact factor: 2.297

8.  Acoustic voice characteristics with and without wearing a facemask.

Authors:  Duy Duong Nguyen; Patricia McCabe; Donna Thomas; Alison Purcell; Maree Doble; Daniel Novakovic; Antonia Chacon; Catherine Madill
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-11       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Analysis of vocal fold function from acoustic data simultaneously recorded with high-speed endoscopy.

Authors:  Michael Döllinger; Melda Kunduk; Manfred Kaltenbacher; Sabine Vondenhoff; Anke Ziethe; Ulrich Eysholdt; Christopher Bohr
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2012-05-25       Impact factor: 2.009

10.  A comparison of Dysphonia Severity Index and Acoustic Voice Quality Index measures in differentiating normal and dysphonic voices.

Authors:  Virgilijus Uloza; Ben Barsties V Latoszek; Nora Ulozaite-Staniene; Tadas Petrauskas; Youri Maryn
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2018-02-13       Impact factor: 2.503

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.