BACKGROUND: Although seasonal patterns of tree pollination have been reported, it is unknown if aerobiologic data correlate with patterns of in vivo sensitization. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the relationship between regional tree pollen exposure and patterns of in vivo percutaneous reactivity to specific tree pollen extracts in a local patient population with seasonal allergic rhinitis. METHODS: Patients with spring seasonal allergic rhinitis and percutaneous sensitivity to 1 or more regional tree pollens were studied. Tree pollen counts were collected at the same urban site from 1997 to 2002 and at a suburban site in 2002. Patients underwent skin prick testing with commercial extracts of 15 indigenous tree species. Serum specific IgE measurements were assayed in a subset of sensitized patients. RESULTS: Of 127 patients who reported symptoms consistent with seasonal allergic rhinitis during the spring pollen season, 93 qualified based on demonstration of at least 1 positive skin prick test result. Mean 5-year pollen counts (1997-2001) and 2002 urban counts were highly correlated (Spearman r = 0.95, P < .001), indicating that year-to-year pollen counts were consistent. No significant correlation was found between mean seasonal pollen counts (urban site, 1997-2001) and frequencies of skin prick test reactivity to specific tree pollen allergens (Spearman r = -0.03, P = .93). No significant relationship was found between 5-year mean tree pollen counts and positive serum specific IgE tests for specific tree pollens (Spearman r = -0.42, P = .30). Eight of 15 species elicited percutaneous reactions in more than 50% of patients (ie, satisfying definition of a major in vivo allergen). However, 6 of the 8 major tree allergens each represented 5% or less of 5-year mean total tree pollen counts. CONCLUSION: No correlation was found between overall frequencies of in vivo sensitization to tree pollen allergens in a local population and regional pollen exposure data.
BACKGROUND: Although seasonal patterns of tree pollination have been reported, it is unknown if aerobiologic data correlate with patterns of in vivo sensitization. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the relationship between regional tree pollen exposure and patterns of in vivo percutaneous reactivity to specific tree pollen extracts in a local patient population with seasonal allergic rhinitis. METHODS:Patients with spring seasonal allergic rhinitis and percutaneous sensitivity to 1 or more regional tree pollens were studied. Tree pollen counts were collected at the same urban site from 1997 to 2002 and at a suburban site in 2002. Patients underwent skin prick testing with commercial extracts of 15 indigenous tree species. Serum specific IgE measurements were assayed in a subset of sensitized patients. RESULTS: Of 127 patients who reported symptoms consistent with seasonal allergic rhinitis during the spring pollen season, 93 qualified based on demonstration of at least 1 positive skin prick test result. Mean 5-year pollen counts (1997-2001) and 2002 urban counts were highly correlated (Spearman r = 0.95, P < .001), indicating that year-to-year pollen counts were consistent. No significant correlation was found between mean seasonal pollen counts (urban site, 1997-2001) and frequencies of skin prick test reactivity to specific tree pollen allergens (Spearman r = -0.03, P = .93). No significant relationship was found between 5-year mean tree pollen counts and positive serum specific IgE tests for specific tree pollens (Spearman r = -0.42, P = .30). Eight of 15 species elicited percutaneous reactions in more than 50% of patients (ie, satisfying definition of a major in vivo allergen). However, 6 of the 8 major tree allergens each represented 5% or less of 5-year mean total tree pollen counts. CONCLUSION: No correlation was found between overall frequencies of in vivo sensitization to tree pollen allergens in a local population and regional pollen exposure data.
Authors: Christopher D Codispoti; David I Bernstein; Linda Levin; Tiina Reponen; Patrick H Ryan; Jocelyn M Biagini Myers; Manuel Villareal; Jeff Burkle; Zana Lummus; James E Lockey; Gurjit K Khurana Hershey; Grace K LeMasters Journal: Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol Date: 2015-03 Impact factor: 6.347
Authors: Lisa Fahey; Guy Robinson; Kate Weinberger; Ashley E Giambrone; Aliza B Solomon Journal: J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr Date: 2017-01 Impact factor: 2.839
Authors: Kazuhiko Ito; Kate R Weinberger; Guy S Robinson; Perry E Sheffield; Ramona Lall; Robert Mathes; Zev Ross; Patrick L Kinney; Thomas D Matte Journal: Environ Health Date: 2015-08-27 Impact factor: 5.984
Authors: Tanviben Y Patel; Mark Buttner; David Rivas; Chad Cross; Dennis A Bazylinski; Joram Seggev Journal: Environ Monit Assess Date: 2018-06-25 Impact factor: 2.513
Authors: Perry E Sheffield; Kate R Weinberger; Kazuhiko Ito; Thomas D Matte; Robert W Mathes; Guy S Robinson; Patrick L Kinney Journal: ISRN Allergy Date: 2011-04-20