Literature DB >> 15765635

Urinary incontinence in community dwelling elderly: are there sex differences in help-seeking behaviour?

Doreth Teunissen1, Toine Lagro-Janssen.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess sex differences in disorder- and patient-specific factors influencing help-seeking behaviour by independently living elderly people with urinary incontinence.
DESIGN: Qualitative and quantitative analyses of the collected data.
SETTING: Patients from nine family practices involved in the Nijmegen Monitoring Project.
SUBJECTS: Independently living elderly aged 60 or over. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The study population consisted of participants in a study on the prevalence of incontinence among elderly people. Independently living elderly people aged 60 or over from nine family practices with uncomplicated urinary incontinence were interviewed at home using a disorder-specific questionnaire and open-ended questions.
RESULTS: In total, 56 men and 314 women were interviewed. Half of them had sought help from a general practitioner. Men sought help from their GP when they had less severe incontinence than women. Help-seeking behaviour in women was related to the duration of symptoms (odds ratio 3.66, 95% CI 1.44-9.39), the presence of incontinence-related symptoms such as constant feeling of vaginal pressure and pain in the lower abdomen (odds ratio 2.69, 95% CI 1.52-4.76) and the severity of incontinence (odds ratio 1.69, 95% CI 0.99-2.88). In men help-seeking was related to the distress experienced in daily life (odds ratio 7.10, 95% CI 1.15-43.91). Most men and women who did not seek help consider their incontinence as not being serious enough, or they had inappropriate beliefs such as that "incontinence is age-related" and "there is nothing that can be done about incontinence".
CONCLUSION: Help-seeking in women is determined by the duration of the symptoms, the presence of concomitant complaints and the severity of incontinence. In men help-seeking behaviour is mostly related to the distress experienced in daily life. In men and women the most important reasons for not seeking help are that they consider the incontinence not serious enough and that they believe that there are no treatment options available.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15765635     DOI: 10.1080/02813430410006666

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Prim Health Care        ISSN: 0281-3432            Impact factor:   2.581


  10 in total

Review 1.  Translational Research and Functional Changes in Voiding Function in Older Adults.

Authors:  Florenta Aura Kullmann; Lori Ann Birder; Karl-Erik Andersson
Journal:  Clin Geriatr Med       Date:  2015-07-23       Impact factor: 3.076

2.  Barriers to seeking care for accidental bowel leakage: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Heidi Wendell Brown; Rebecca G Rogers; Meg E Wise
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2016-11-14       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 3.  Gender differences in bladder control: from babies to elderly.

Authors:  Ricarda M Bauer; Wilhelm Huebner
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  Racial differences in self-reported healthcare seeking and treatment for urinary incontinence in community-dwelling women from the EPI Study.

Authors:  Mitchell B Berger; Divya A Patel; Janis M Miller; John O Delancey; Dee E Fenner
Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn       Date:  2011-06-29       Impact factor: 2.696

5.  Systematic screening for urinary incontinence in older women: who could benefit from it?

Authors:  Els Visser; Geertruida H de Bock; Boudewijn J Kollen; Marije Meijerink; Marjolein Y Berger; Janny H Dekker
Journal:  Scand J Prim Health Care       Date:  2012-02-12       Impact factor: 2.581

6.  A screening tool for clinically relevant urinary incontinence.

Authors:  Anne M Suskind; Rodney L Dunn; Daniel M Morgan; John O L DeLancey; Karl T Rew; John T Wei
Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn       Date:  2014-01-25       Impact factor: 2.696

7.  Urinary incontinence in hospitalised elderly patients: do nurses recognise and manage the problem?

Authors:  Sabin Zürcher; Susi Saxer; René Schwendimann
Journal:  Nurs Res Pract       Date:  2011-04-06

8.  Incongruous consultation behaviour: results from a UK-wide population survey.

Authors:  Alison M Elliott; Anne McAteer; Philip C Hannaford
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2012-03-20       Impact factor: 2.497

Review 9.  Approach to a woman with urinary incontinence.

Authors:  Manidip Pal; Abhijit Halder; Soma Bandyopadhyay
Journal:  Urol Ann       Date:  2019-11-07

10.  Gender sensitivity among general practitioners: results of a training programme.

Authors:  Halime H Celik; Ineke I Klinge; Trudy T van der Weijden; Guy G A M Widdershoven; Toine A L M Lagro-Janssen
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2008-06-26       Impact factor: 2.463

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.