Literature DB >> 15765235

Disruption of magnetic orientation in hatchling loggerhead sea turtles by pulsed magnetic fields.

William P Irwin1, Kenneth J Lohmann.   

Abstract

Loggerhead sea turtles (Caretta caretta) derive both directional and positional information from the Earth's magnetic field, but the mechanism underlying magnetic field detection in turtles has not been determined. One hypothesis is that crystals of biogenic, single-domain magnetite provide the physical basis of the magnetic sense. As a first step toward determining if magnetite is involved in sea turtle magnetoreception, hatchling loggerheads were exposed to pulsed magnetic fields (40 mT, 4 ms rise time) capable of altering the magnetic dipole moment of biogenic magnetite crystals. A control group of turtles was treated identically but not exposed to the pulsed fields. Both groups of turtles subsequently oriented toward a light source, implying that the pulsed fields did not disrupt the motivation to swim or the ability to maintain a consistent heading. However, when swimming in darkness under conditions in which turtles normally orient magnetically, control turtles oriented significantly toward the offshore migratory direction while those that were exposed to the magnetic pulses did not. These results are consistent with the hypothesis that at least part of the sea turtle magnetoreception system is based on magnetite. In principle, a magnetite-based magnetoreception system might be involved in detecting directional information, positional information, or both.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15765235     DOI: 10.1007/s00359-005-0609-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol        ISSN: 0340-7594            Impact factor:   1.836


  19 in total

1.  A model for photoreceptor-based magnetoreception in birds.

Authors:  T Ritz; S Adem; K Schulten
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 2.  Magnetite-based magnetoreception.

Authors:  J L Kirschvink; M M Walker; C E Diebel
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 6.627

3.  Resonance effects indicate a radical-pair mechanism for avian magnetic compass.

Authors:  Thorsten Ritz; Peter Thalau; John B Phillips; Roswitha Wiltschko; Wolfgang Wiltschko
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-05-13       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Structure and function of the vertebrate magnetic sense.

Authors:  M M Walker; C E Diebel; C V Haugh; P M Pankhurst; J C Montgomery; C R Green
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1997-11-27       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Regional magnetic fields as navigational markers for sea turtles.

Authors:  K J Lohmann; S D Cain; S A Dodge; C M Lohmann
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-10-12       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Magnet-induced disorientation in hatchling loggerhead sea turtles.

Authors:  William P Irwin; Kenneth J Lohmann
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 3.312

7.  The case for light-dependent magnetic orientation in animals

Authors: 
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 3.312

8.  DETECTION OF MAGNETIC INCLINATION ANGLE BY SEA TURTLES: A POSSIBLE MECHANISM FOR DETERMINING LATITUDE

Authors: 
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 3.312

9.  ACQUISITION OF MAGNETIC DIRECTIONAL PREFERENCE IN HATCHLING LOGGERHEAD SEA TURTLES

Authors: 
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 3.312

10.  Magnetic orientation by hatchling loggerhead sea turtles (Caretta caretta).

Authors:  K J Lohmann
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 3.312

View more
  14 in total

Review 1.  Identifying Cellular and Molecular Mechanisms for Magnetosensation.

Authors:  Benjamin L Clites; Jonathan T Pierce
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2017-07-25       Impact factor: 12.449

2.  Differential effects of magnetic pulses on the orientation of naturally migrating birds.

Authors:  Richard A Holland
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2010-05-07       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 3.  Magnetic particle-mediated magnetoreception.

Authors:  Jeremy Shaw; Alastair Boyd; Michael House; Robert Woodward; Falko Mathes; Gary Cowin; Martin Saunders; Boris Baer
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2015-09-06       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 4.  Physiological, behavioral, and ecological aspects of migration in reptiles.

Authors:  Amanda Southwood; Larisa Avens
Journal:  J Comp Physiol B       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.200

5.  Transduction of the Geomagnetic Field as Evidenced from alpha-Band Activity in the Human Brain.

Authors:  Connie X Wang; Isaac A Hilburn; Daw-An Wu; Yuki Mizuhara; Christopher P Cousté; Jacob N H Abrahams; Sam E Bernstein; Ayumu Matani; Shinsuke Shimojo; Joseph L Kirschvink
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2019-04-26

6.  Magnetite-based magnetoreception: the effect of repeated pulsing on the orientation of migratory birds.

Authors:  Wolfgang Wiltschko; Hugh Ford; Ursula Munro; Michael Winklhofer; Roswitha Wiltschko
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2007-02-23       Impact factor: 2.389

Review 7.  Physiological origin of biogenic magnetic nanoparticles in health and disease: from bacteria to humans.

Authors:  Oksana Gorobets; Svitlana Gorobets; Marceli Koralewski
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2017-06-12

8.  A quantitative assessment of torque-transducer models for magnetoreception.

Authors:  Michael Winklhofer; Joseph L Kirschvink
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2010-01-19       Impact factor: 4.118

9.  A novel concept of Fe-mineral-based magnetoreception: histological and physicochemical data from the upper beak of homing pigeons.

Authors:  Gerta Fleissner; Branko Stahl; Peter Thalau; Gerald Falkenberg; Günther Fleissner
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2007-03-15

10.  Bats use magnetite to detect the earth's magnetic field.

Authors:  Richard A Holland; Joseph L Kirschvink; Thomas G Doak; Martin Wikelski
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-02-27       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.