Literature DB >> 15764217

Can photon IMRT be improved by combination with mixed electron and photon techniques?

Xiangkui Mu1, Lennart Olofsson, Mikael Karlsson, Rickard Sjögren, Björn Zackrisson.   

Abstract

Conformal radiotherapy or intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) commonly leads to a large integral dose in the patient. Electrons would reduce the integral dose but are not suitable for treating deep-seated tumours, owing to their limited penetration. By combining electron and photon beams, the dose distributions may be improved. In this study, the possibility is explored of using a mixture of electron and photon beams for a deep-seated target volume in the head and neck region. Treatment plans were made for five simulated head and neck cancer cases. Mixed electron and photon beam plans (MB) were constructed using a manual iterative procedure. Photon IMRT plans were optimized automatically. Both electron and photon beams were collimated by a computer controlled multi-leaf collimator (MLC). Both methods were able to produce clinically acceptable plans. Criteria for the target dose were met similarly by both as were the criteria for critical organs. The integral dose outside the planning target volume (PTV) showed a tendency to be lower with MB plans compared with photon IMRT plans. A mixed electron and photon technique has the potential to treat deep-seated tumours. It is reasonable to expect that if computerized optimization tools were coupled with the mixed electron and photon beam technique, treatment goals would be more readily achieved than if using solely pure photon IMRT.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15764217     DOI: 10.1080/02841860410002761

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Oncol        ISSN: 0284-186X            Impact factor:   4.089


  4 in total

1.  Preliminary comparison of helical tomotherapy and mixed beams of unmodulated electrons and intensity modulated radiation therapy for treating superficial cancers of the parotid gland and nasal cavity.

Authors:  Olivier Blasi; Jonas D Fontenot; Robert S Fields; John P Gibbons; Kenneth R Hogstrom
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2011-12-28       Impact factor: 3.481

2.  Gafchromic EBT3 film dosimetry in electron beams - energy dependence and improved film read-out.

Authors:  Petri Sipilä; Jarkko Ojala; Sampsa Kaijaluoto; Ilkka Jokelainen; Antti Kosunen
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2016-01-08       Impact factor: 2.102

3.  Tungsten filled 3D printed field shaping devices for electron beam radiation therapy.

Authors:  Lawrie Skinner; Benjamin P Fahimian; Amy S Yu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-06-19       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Design and production of 3D printed bolus for electron radiation therapy.

Authors:  Shiqin Su; Kathryn Moran; James L Robar
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2014-07-08       Impact factor: 2.102

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.