Literature DB >> 15764216

Does stage at diagnosis explain the difference in survival after breast cancer in Denmark and Sweden?

Anni Ravnsbaek Jensen1, Jens Peter Garne, Hans Henrik Storm, Gerda Engholm, Torgil Möller, Jens Overgaard.   

Abstract

Breast cancer survival differs 9 percentage points between the neighbouring countries of Denmark and Sweden. The authors' aim was to analyse whether this was caused by early detection in Sweden. The extent of disease and outcome was compared in two population-based breast cancer cohorts in 1983-1989. Breast cancer management was decentralized in Denmark without mammography screening whereas treatment in Sweden was centralized and the population partly screened. Ten- and 15-year relative survival was 15% and 6% higher in Sweden (p<0.001) with corresponding differences in crude and disease-specific survival. Stage distribution was significantly more favourable in the Swedish cohort. In multivariate analysis age, tumour size, extent of axillary surgery, and spread affected survival; however, the impact of region persisted (p<0.001). Reanalysis without screening-detected patients only slightly affected the impact of region. It was concluded that early detection had significant impact on survival but other regional differences might be of importance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15764216     DOI: 10.1080/02841860410002789

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Oncol        ISSN: 0284-186X            Impact factor:   4.089


  6 in total

1.  Glucocorticoid prescriptions and breast cancer recurrence: a Danish nationwide prospective cohort study.

Authors:  L W Lietzen; T Ahern; P Christiansen; A B Jensen; H T Sørensen; T L Lash; D P Cronin-Fenton
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2014-09-15       Impact factor: 32.976

2.  Breast cancer incidence and case fatality among 4.7 million women in relation to social and ethnic background: a population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Omid Beiki; Per Hall; Anders Ekbom; Tahereh Moradi
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2012-01-06       Impact factor: 6.466

3.  Secondary care intervals before and after the introduction of urgent referral guidelines for suspected cancer in Denmark: a comparative before-after study.

Authors:  Mette Bach Larsen; Rikke Pilegaard Hansen; Dorte Gilså Hansen; Frede Olesen; Peter Vedsted
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2013-09-10       Impact factor: 2.655

4.  Relative mortality in soft tissue sarcoma patients: a Danish population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Katja Maretty-Nielsen; Ninna Aggerholm-Pedersen; Johnny Keller; Akmal Safwat; Steen Baerentzen; Alma B Pedersen
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2014-09-19       Impact factor: 4.430

5.  A visual summary of the EUROCARE-4 results: a UK perspective.

Authors:  H Møller; K M Linklater; D Robinson
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2009-12-03       Impact factor: 7.640

6.  Breast cancer survival and stage at diagnosis in Australia, Canada, Denmark, Norway, Sweden and the UK, 2000-2007: a population-based study.

Authors:  S Walters; C Maringe; J Butler; B Rachet; P Barrett-Lee; J Bergh; J Boyages; P Christiansen; M Lee; F Wärnberg; C Allemani; G Engholm; T Fornander; M L Gjerstorff; T B Johannesen; G Lawrence; C E McGahan; R Middleton; J Steward; E Tracey; D Turner; M A Richards; M P Coleman
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 7.640

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.