Literature DB >> 15763119

A direct comparison of presenting characteristics of depressed outpatients from primary vs. specialty care settings: preliminary findings from the STAR*D clinical trial.

Bradley N Gaynes1, A John Rush, Madhukar Trivedi, Stephen R Wisniewski, G K Balasubramani, Donald C Spencer, Timothy Petersen, Michael Klinkman, Diane Warden, Robert K Schneider, Daniel B Castro, Robert N Golden.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: No study has directly compared the clinical features of depression for patients entering clinical trials using identical enrollment criteria at primary care (PC) and specialty care (SC) settings. The Sequenced Treatment Alternatives to Relieve Depression (STAR*D) study (http://www.star-d.org) provides a unique opportunity to provide this comparison for patients with a major depressive disorder (MDD) requiring treatment. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: We report baseline data for the first 1500 patients enrolled in this trial involving 41 clinic sites (18 PC, 23 SC). Broadly inclusive eligibility criteria required that patients have a DSM-IV diagnosis of nonpsychotic MDD, have not failed an adequate medication trial during their current episode and score>or=14 on the 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D17). Primary outcomes included the 30-item Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Clinician-Rated (IDS-C30) and the HAM-D17.
RESULTS: Specialty care and PC patients had equivalent degrees of depressive severity (IDS-C30=35.8; HAM-D17=20.4). Specialty care patients were almost twice as likely to report a prior suicide attempt than PC patients (21% vs. 12%, P<.0001) and slightly less likely to endorse suicidal ideation in the past week (45.0% vs. 50.8%, P=.006). The only other distinguishing core symptoms were a slightly lower likelihood of PC patients endorsing depressed mood (95.2% vs. 97.7%, P=.032) or anhedonia (66.3% vs. 70.7%, P=.042, IDS-C30) and a lower likelihood of PC patients endorsing weight loss (IDS-C30). HAM-D17 results were identical.
CONCLUSION: Depressive severity was not different, and symptomatic presentations did not differ substantially. Major depressive disorder is more similar than different among patients at SC and PC settings. Thus, similar clinical and research methods for screening, detecting and measuring treatment outcomes can be applied in both settings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15763119     DOI: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2004.10.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gen Hosp Psychiatry        ISSN: 0163-8343            Impact factor:   3.238


  24 in total

1.  Effect of depression and diabetes mellitus on the risk for dementia: a national population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Wayne Katon; Henrik Sondergaard Pedersen; Anette Riisgaard Ribe; Morten Fenger-Grøn; Dimitry Davydow; Frans Boch Waldorff; Mogens Vestergaard
Journal:  JAMA Psychiatry       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 21.596

2.  The Fracture of Relational Space in Depression: Predicaments in Primary Care Help Seeking.

Authors:  Elizabeth Bromley; David Kennedy; Jeanne Miranda; Cathy Donald Sherbourne; Kenneth B Wells
Journal:  Curr Anthropol       Date:  2016-08-15

3.  Who gets mental health treatment from the GP? Results from the Israel National Epidemiological Mental Health Survey.

Authors:  Yaacov Lerner; Daphna Levinson
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  2012-03-02       Impact factor: 2.267

4.  Developing Adaptive Treatment Strategies to Address Suicidal Risk in College Students: A Pilot Sequential, Multiple Assignment, Randomized Trial (SMART).

Authors:  Jacqueline Pistorello; David A Jobes; Scott N Compton; Nadia Samad Locey; Joseph C Walloch; Robert Gallop; Josephine S Au; Samantha K Noose; Maria Young; Jacquelyn Johnson; Yani Dickens; Patricia Chatham; Tami Jeffcoat; Georgia Dalto; Spondita Goswami
Journal:  Arch Suicide Res       Date:  2018-02-12

Review 5.  The presentation, recognition and management of bipolar depression in primary care.

Authors:  Joseph M Cerimele; Lydia A Chwastiak; Ya-Fen Chan; David A Harrison; Jürgen Unützer
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  Factorial and diagnostic validity of the Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II) in Croatian primary health care.

Authors:  Nenad Jakšić; Ena Ivezić; Nataša Jokić-Begić; Zsuzsanna Surányi; Stanislava Stojanović-Špehar
Journal:  J Clin Psychol Med Settings       Date:  2013-09

7.  Clinical differences among patients treated for mental health problems in general medical and specialty mental health settings in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication.

Authors:  Lisa A Uebelacker; Philip S Wang; Patricia Berglund; Ronald C Kessler
Journal:  Gen Hosp Psychiatry       Date:  2006 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.238

8.  Translating Science Into Service: Lessons Learned From the Sequenced Treatment Alternatives to Relieve Depression (STAR*D) Study.

Authors:  Norman Sussman
Journal:  Prim Care Companion J Clin Psychiatry       Date:  2007

9.  Rapid cycling bipolar disorders in primary and tertiary care treated patients.

Authors:  Tomas Hajek; Margaret Hahn; Claire Slaney; Julie Garnham; Joshua Green; Martina Růzicková; Peter Zvolský; Martin Alda
Journal:  Bipolar Disord       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 6.744

10.  Validity of the bereavement exclusion criterion for the diagnosis of major depressive episode.

Authors:  Sidney Zisook; Katherine Shear; Kenneth S Kendler
Journal:  World Psychiatry       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 49.548

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.