Literature DB >> 15763090

High-level arsenite removal from groundwater by zero-valent iron.

Hsing-Lung Lien1, Richard T Wilkin.   

Abstract

The objectives of this study were to conduct batch and column studies to (i) assess the effectiveness of zero-valent iron for arsenic remediation in groundwater, (ii) determine removal mechanisms of arsenic, and (iii) evaluate implications of these processes with regard to the stability of arsenic and long-term remedial performance of the permeable reactive barrier (PRB) technology. A high concentration arsenic solution (50 mg l(-1)) was prepared by using sodium arsenite (arsenic (III)) to simulate groundwater at a heavily contaminated Superfund site in the USA. Batch studies indicate that the removal of arsenic is a two-step reaction with fast initial disappearance of arsenite followed by a slow subsequent removal process. Flow-through columns were conducted at a flow rate of 17 ml h(-1) under reducing conditions for 6.6 mo. Kinetic analysis suggested that arsenic removal behaves as a zero-order reaction at high arsenic concentrations. Arsenic removal rate constants decreased with time and arsenic breakthrough was observed in the column study. Arsenic removal capacity of zero-valent iron was determined to be approximately 7.5 mg As/g Fe. Carbonate green rust was identified from the analysis of surface precipitates; arsenite uptake by green rust may be a major mechanism responsible for arsenic remediation by zero-valent iron. Analysis of HCl-extractable arsenic from iron samples indicated that approximately 28% of arsenic was in the form of arsenate suggesting that a surface oxidation process was involved in the arsenic removal with zero-valent iron.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15763090     DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2004.10.055

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chemosphere        ISSN: 0045-6535            Impact factor:   7.086


  6 in total

1.  Removing arsenic from groundwater in Cambodia using high performance iron adsorbent.

Authors:  Y Kang; R Takeda; A Nada; L Thavarith; S Tang; K Nuki; K Sakurai
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2014-06-04       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  In situ removal of arsenic from groundwater by using permeable reactive barriers of organic matter/limestone/zero-valent iron mixtures.

Authors:  O Gibert; J de Pablo; J-L Cortina; C Ayora
Journal:  Environ Geochem Health       Date:  2010-04-13       Impact factor: 4.609

3.  Modeling groundwater contaminant transport in the presence of large heterogeneity: A case study comparing MT3D and RWhet.

Authors:  Zhilin Guo; Graham E Fogg; Mark L Brusseau; Eric M LaBolle; Jose Lopez
Journal:  Hydrogeol J       Date:  2019-02-15       Impact factor: 3.178

4.  Removal of Arsenic from water using synthetic Fe7S8 nanoparticles.

Authors:  Jesus Cantu; Louis E Gonzalez; Jacqueline Goodship; Monica Contreras; Meera Joseph; Cameron Garza; T M Eubanks; J G Parsons
Journal:  Chem Eng J       Date:  2016-04-15       Impact factor: 13.273

5.  In situ arsenic immobilisation for coastal aquifers using stimulated iron cycling: Lab-based viability assessment.

Authors:  Alyssa Barron; Jing Sun; Stefania Passaretti; Chiara Sbarbati; Maurizio Barbieri; Nicolò Colombani; James Jamieson; Benjamin C Bostick; Yan Zheng; Micòl Mastrocicco; Marco Petitta; Henning Prommer
Journal:  Appl Geochem       Date:  2021-11-29       Impact factor: 3.524

6.  Spatiotemporal Mineral Phase Evolution and Arsenic Retention in Microfluidic Models of Zerovalent Iron-Based Water Treatment.

Authors:  Jonas Wielinski; Joaquin Jimenez-Martinez; Jörg Göttlicher; Ralph Steininger; Stefan Mangold; Stephan J Hug; Michael Berg; Andreas Voegelin
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2022-09-12       Impact factor: 11.357

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.