Literature DB >> 15760420

Analytical approaches for transplant research, 2004.

Douglas E Schaubel1, Dawn M Dykstra, Susan Murray, Valarie B Ashby, Keith P McCullough, David M Dickinson, Tempie E Hulbert-Shearon, Randall L Webb, Robert A Wolfe.   

Abstract

This article provides detailed explanations of the methods frequently employed in outcomes analyses performed by the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR). All aspects of the analytical process are discussed, including cohort selection, post-transplant follow-up analysis, outcome definition, ascertainment of events, censoring, and adjustments. The methods employed for descriptive analyses are described, such as unadjusted mortality rates and survival probabilities, and the estimation of covariant effects through regression modeling. A section on transplant waiting time focuses on the kidney and liver waiting lists, pointing out the different considerations each list requires and the larger questions that such analyses raise. Additionally, this article describes specialized modeling strategies recently designed by the SRTR and aimed at specific organ allocation issues. The article concludes with a description of simulated allocation modeling (SAM), which has been developed by the SRTR for three organ systems: liver, thoracic organs, and kidney-pancreas. SAMs are particularly useful for comparing outcomes for proposed national allocation policies. The use of SAMs has already helped in the development and implementation of a new policy for liver candidates with high MELD scores to be offered organs regionally before the organs are offered to candidates with low MELD scores locally.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15760420     DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-6135.2005.00837.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Transplant        ISSN: 1600-6135            Impact factor:   8.086


  11 in total

1.  Prognostic impact of mechanical ventilation after liver transplantation: a national database study.

Authors:  Hui Yuan; Janet E Tuttle-Newhall; Vikram Chawa; Mark A Schnitzler; Huiling Xiao; David Axelrod; Nino Dzebisashvili; Krista L Lentine
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2014-07-18       Impact factor: 2.565

2.  Presentation and Outcomes of C4d-Negative Antibody-Mediated Rejection After Kidney Transplantation.

Authors:  B J Orandi; N Alachkar; E S Kraus; F Naqvi; B E Lonze; L Lees; K J Van Arendonk; C Wickliffe; S M Bagnasco; A A Zachary; D L Segev; R A Montgomery
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 8.086

3.  Using mechanistic models to simulate comparative effectiveness trials of therapy and to estimate long-term outcomes in HIV care.

Authors:  Mark S Roberts; Kimberly A Nucifora; R Scott Braithwaite
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 2.983

4.  Center-level variation in the development of delayed graft function after deceased donor kidney transplantation.

Authors:  Babak J Orandi; Nathan T James; Erin C Hall; Kyle J Van Arendonk; Jacqueline M Garonzik-Wang; Natasha Gupta; Robert A Montgomery; Niraj M Desai; Dorry L Segev
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 4.939

Review 5.  Immunosuppressive therapy protocols in kidney transplantation in adults.

Authors:  Jasenko Karamehić; Marc Lorber; Richard Formica; Faris Gavrankapetanović; Bećir Heljić; Demo Subasić; Lamija Zecević
Journal:  Bosn J Basic Med Sci       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 3.363

6.  Transplanting hepatitis C virus-positive livers into hepatitis C virus-negative patients with preemptive antiviral treatment: A modeling study.

Authors:  Jagpreet Chhatwal; Sumeyye Samur; Emily D Bethea; Turgay Ayer; Fasiha Kanwal; Chin Hur; Mark S Roberts; Norah Terrault; Raymond T Chung
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2018-04-19       Impact factor: 17.425

7.  Disparities in Waitlist and Posttransplantation Outcomes in Liver Transplant Registrants and Recipients Aged 18 to 24 Years: Analysis of the UNOS Database.

Authors:  Noelle H Ebel; Evelyn K Hsu; Kristin Berry; Simon P Horslen; George N Ioannou
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 4.939

8.  Quantifying renal allograft loss following early antibody-mediated rejection.

Authors:  B J Orandi; E H K Chow; A Hsu; N Gupta; K J Van Arendonk; J M Garonzik-Wang; J R Montgomery; C Wickliffe; B E Lonze; S M Bagnasco; N Alachkar; E S Kraus; A M Jackson; R A Montgomery; D L Segev
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2015-01-21       Impact factor: 8.086

9.  Hepatic macrosteatosis in the US pediatric deceased liver donor population.

Authors:  Joshua W Purvis; Babak J Orandi; Deepti Dhall; Chandler McLeod; Luz Helena Gutierrez Sanchez; Meagan Gray; Kayla Frey; Saulat S Sheikh; Robert M Cannon; Norah A Terrault; Cora E Lewis; Jayme E Locke
Journal:  Pediatr Transplant       Date:  2021-09-30

10.  Waiting for liver transplantation in Canada: waitlist history 2000--2004 and sensitivity analysis for the future.

Authors:  David A Stanford; Elizabeth M Renouf; Vivian C McAlister
Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci       Date:  2008-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.