Literature DB >> 15760359

Relationships among growth, development and plastic response to environment quality in a perennial plant.

Ken S Moriuchi1, Alice A Winn.   

Abstract

Phenotypic traits differ between plants in different environments and within individuals as they grow and develop. Comparing plants in different environments at a common age can obscure the developmental basis for differences in phenotype means in different environments. Here, we compared trait means and patterns of trait ontogeny for perennial (Viola septemloba) plants growing in environments that differed in quality either naturally or due to experimental manipulation. Consistent with predictions for adaptive stress resistance, plants grown in lower-quality environments allocated proportionately more biomass to roots and rhizomes, and produced smaller, thicker and longer-lived leaves. The developmental trajectory of almost all traits differed between environments, and these differences contributed to observed differences in trait means. Plants were able to alter their initial developmental trajectory in response to an increase in resources after 8 wk of growth. This result contrasts with previous findings, and may reflect a difference in the way that annual and perennial species respond to stress. Our results demonstrate the complexity of interactions between the environment and the development of the phenotype that underlie putatively adaptive plastic responses to environment quality. Copyright New Phytologist (2005).

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15760359     DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2005.01346.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  New Phytol        ISSN: 0028-646X            Impact factor:   10.151


  10 in total

1.  Leaf herbivory and drought stress affect floral attractive and defensive traits in Nicotiana quadrivalvis.

Authors:  Stacey L Halpern; Lynn S Adler; Michael Wink
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2010-05-12       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Heteroblastic development and the optimal partitioning of traits among contrasting environments in Acacia implexa.

Authors:  Michael A Forster; Stephen P Bonser
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2008-11-01       Impact factor: 4.357

3.  Changes in plant chemical defenses and nutritional quality as a function of ontogeny in Plantago lanceolata (Plantaginaceae).

Authors:  Carolina Quintero; M Deane Bowers
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2011-09-13       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 4.  Perennial roots to immortality.

Authors:  Sergi Munné-Bosch
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2014-02-21       Impact factor: 8.340

5.  Interspecific correlates of plasticity in relative growth rate following a decrease in nitrogen availability.

Authors:  Antonio Useche; Bill Shipley
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2009-11-25       Impact factor: 4.357

Review 6.  Vegetative phase change and shoot maturation in plants.

Authors:  R Scott Poethig
Journal:  Curr Top Dev Biol       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 4.897

7.  The effect of allometric partitioning on herbivory tolerance in four species in South China.

Authors:  Zhe-Xuan Fan; Bao-Ming Chen; Hui-Xuan Liao; Guo-Hao Zhou; Shao-Lin Peng
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2019-10-02       Impact factor: 2.912

8.  Knockdown of ghAlba_4 and ghAlba_5 Proteins in Cotton Inhibits Root Growth and Increases Sensitivity to Drought and Salt Stresses.

Authors:  Richard Odongo Magwanga; Joy Nyangasi Kirungu; Pu Lu; Xiaoyan Cai; Yanchao Xu; Xingxing Wang; Zhongli Zhou; Yuqing Hou; Stephen Gaya Agong; Kunbo Wang; Fang Liu
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2019-10-15       Impact factor: 5.753

9.  Distinguishing the biomass allocation variance resulting from ontogenetic drift or acclimation to soil texture.

Authors:  Jiangbo Xie; Lisong Tang; Zhongyuan Wang; Guiqing Xu; Yan Li
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-07-24       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Allometric biomass partitioning under nitrogen enrichment: Evidence from manipulative experiments around the world.

Authors:  Yunfeng Peng; Yuanhe Yang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-06-28       Impact factor: 4.379

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.