Literature DB >> 15760054

Investigation of various factors affecting encapsulation on the in-cap automatic capsule-filling machine.

Renuka Nair1, Murti Vemuri, Praful Agrawala, Soo-il Kim.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the factors that influence fill weight and weight variability of capsules produced on the In-Cap and to assess any differences in terms of capsule defects between gelatin and HPMC (Quali-V) shells. The In-Cap is an automatic tamping type capsule-filling machine and the low output of approximately 3000 capsules/hour makes it ideal for early formulation development and phase I/IIa clinical supplies manufacture. Four commonly used excipients (Avicel PH101, Avicel PH302, A-Tab, and Prosolv HD90) and a poorly flowing drug blend were encapsulated at various pin settings and powder bed heights. The average fill weight and coefficient of weight variation were determined. The percentage of defective capsules formed during encapsulation was calculated. Results of the study showed that pin setting was critical for controlling the fill weight and the weight variation. The order of pin setting with pin 1 (closer to the powder chute) set to a relatively higher position and pin 4 (before ejection) set to a lower position was found to give higher fill weights with relatively lower weight variability. The powder bed height influenced the fill weight for poorly flowing powders. The capsule machine speed did not appear to significantly influence the fill weight. The fill weight and weight variation were found to depend on the flow property of the material. A large percentage of defective capsules was obtained using HPMC shell size #00. Some of the commonly observed defects included split caps and improperly closed filled capsules. In general, appropriate selection of pin settings and bed height can reduce the weight variability seen, especially with poorly flowing high-dose formulations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15760054      PMCID: PMC2750482          DOI: 10.1208/pt050457

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AAPS PharmSciTech        ISSN: 1530-9932            Impact factor:   3.246


  10 in total

1.  Powder filling into hard gelatine capsules on a tamp filling machine.

Authors:  F Podczeck; J M Newton
Journal:  Int J Pharm       Date:  1999-08-20       Impact factor: 5.875

2.  The development of an instrumented tamp-filling capsule machine II. Investigations of plug development and tamping pressure at different filling stations.

Authors:  F Podczeck
Journal:  Eur J Pharm Sci       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 4.384

Review 3.  The filling of powders into two-piece hard capsules.

Authors:  B E Jones
Journal:  Int J Pharm       Date:  2001-10-04       Impact factor: 5.875

4.  Comparison of the formulation requirements of dosator and dosing disc automatic capsule filling machines.

Authors:  Pavan K Heda; Kapiamba Muteba; Larry L Augsburger
Journal:  AAPS PharmSci       Date:  2002

5.  Composite method to quantify powder flow as a screening method in early tablet or capsule formulation development.

Authors:  M K Taylor; J Ginsburg; A Hickey; F Gheyas
Journal:  AAPS PharmSciTech       Date:  2000-06-24       Impact factor: 3.246

6.  Resistance to densification, tensile strength and capsule-filling performance of some pharmaceutical diluents.

Authors:  I Nikolakakis; O B Aragon; S Malamataris
Journal:  J Pharm Pharmacol       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 3.765

7.  Encapsulation of clomacran phosphate [2-chloro-9[3-(dimethylamino) propyl]acridan phosphate] I. Effect of flowability of powder blends, lot-to-lot variability, and concentration of active ingredient on weight variation of capsules filled on an automatic capsule-filling machine.

Authors:  G M Irwin; G J Dodson; L J Ravin
Journal:  J Pharm Sci       Date:  1970-04       Impact factor: 3.534

Review 8.  Cross-linking of gelatin capsules and its relevance to their in vitro-in vivo performance.

Authors:  G A Digenis; T B Gold; V P Shah
Journal:  J Pharm Sci       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 3.534

9.  Weight and weight uniformity of hard gelatin capsules filled with microcrystalline cellulose and silicified microcrystalline cellulose.

Authors:  Linda A Felton; Daniel I Garcia; Ryan Farmer
Journal:  Drug Dev Ind Pharm       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  An investigation of some factors influencing plug formation and fill weight in a dosing disk-type automatic capsule-filling machine.

Authors:  K B Shah; L L Augsburger; K Marshall
Journal:  J Pharm Sci       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 3.534

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.