Literature DB >> 15759206

Ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm: endovascular treatment.

P Castelli1, R Caronno, G Piffaretti, M Tozzi, D Laganà, G Carrafiello, S Cuffari, A Bacuzzi.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This report describes our preliminary experience in endovascular management of 25 ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (rAAAs).
METHODS: In the past 3 years we treated 46 patients who had rAAA, and 25 (54.3%) were treated with an endovascular approach. Patients' mean age was 76 +/- 9 years. The diagnosis was confirmed by computed tomographic angiography in 23 patients (92%). Mean aneurysm diameter was 73 +/- 17 mm. We used an infrarenal bifurcated device in 17 patients (68%), a suprarenal bifurcated in four patients (16%), and an aortomonoiliac graft in four patients (16%). Overall, nine patients (36%) required intensive care. Every patient underwent radiologic follow-up according to the Eurostar register, with concomitant evaluation of the D-dimer level (cut-off <200 microg/L) as a biological marker for endoleaks.
RESULTS: The primary technical success rate was 100%. Overall in-hospital mortality rate was 20%. Mean hospitalization was 7 days (range, 3-30), and mean follow-up was 7 months. One occlusion (4%) of the iliac limb and two type II endoleaks (8%) occurred. The mean D-dimer level in type I endoleak was 1045 microg/L (range, 459-2021).
CONCLUSIONS: In our experience, endovascular management of rAAA is feasible and safe and produces better results than conventional surgery, provided the morphology is suitable and the procedure is carried out by an experienced endovascular team.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15759206     DOI: 10.1007/s00261-004-0272-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Abdom Imaging        ISSN: 0942-8925


  6 in total

1.  Endovascular repair of thoracic and abdominal aortic ruptures: a single-center experience.

Authors:  Filiz İslim; Aysun Erbahçeci Salık; Koray Güven; Vedat Bakuy; Zafer Çukurova
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2014 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.630

2.  Endovascular techniques for the treatment of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms: 7-year intention-to-treat results.

Authors:  Ilias Dalainas; Giovanni Nano; Paolo Bianchi; Silvia Stegher; Renato Casana; Giovanni Malacrida; Domenico G Tealdi
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Endovascular treatment of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms: aorto-uni-iliac or bifurcated endograft?

Authors:  G Carrafiello; G Piffaretti; D Laganà; F Fontana; M Mangini; A M Ierardi; F Piacentino; A Canì; G Mariscalco; A Di Massa; S Cuffari; P Castelli; C Fugazzola
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2011-09-02       Impact factor: 3.469

4.  Tissue responses to endovascular stent grafts for saccular abdominal aortic aneurysms in a canine model.

Authors:  Hyun Beom Kim; Young Ho Choi; Young Ho So; Seung-Kee Min; Hyo-Cheol Kim; Young Il Kim; Jae Hyung Park; Jin Wook Chung
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2012-10-02       Impact factor: 2.153

5.  National outcomes for the treatment of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm: comparison of open versus endovascular repairs.

Authors:  Natalia Egorova; Jeannine Giacovelli; Giampaolo Greco; Annetine Gelijns; Craig K Kent; James F McKinsey
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 4.268

Review 6.  Endovascular vs. Open Repair for Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm.

Authors:  Nikolaos Patelis; Demetrios Moris; Georgios Karaolanis; Sotiris Georgopoulos
Journal:  Med Sci Monit Basic Res       Date:  2016-04-19
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.