RATIONALE: We previously reported that the NR2B subunit-selective N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) antagonist Ro 63-1908 produced a marked deficit in response control in the five-choice serial reaction time task (5-CSRTT). OBJECTIVES: The present studies were designed to investigate this further by studying the NR2B NMDA antagonists, ifenprodil, traxoprodil (CP101,606), Ro 25-6981 as well as Ro 63-1908 in this test. METHODS: Following training in the 5-CSRTT, separate groups of rats were either tested under (1) standard test conditions [5 s inter-trial interval (ITI), 0.5 s stimulus duration, 100 trials], (2) high (3 s ITI) and low (10 s ITI) event rate of stimulus presentation and (3) a 250-trial protocol in aged 2-year-old rats. In a final study, the effects of traxoprodil were investigated in an operant delayed match to position (DMTP) task, a test of working memory, and compared to dizocilpine and Ro 63-1908. RESULTS: Similar to Ro 63-1908, both traxoprodil (1-10 mg/kg) and Ro 25-6981 (3--30 mg/kg) increased premature responding but also increased response speed with no error trade-off. Conversely, ifenprodil (1--10 mg/kg) slowed response speed and increased omissions with no effect on premature responding. Tested under a variable ITI, Ro 63--1908 (1 mg/kg) increased premature responding at all ITIs, but this change was proportional to controls. At short ITI (3 s), Ro 63-1908 reliably improved performance both in terms of response speed and accuracy (percent correct). In a 250-trial protocol in aged rats, both Ro 63-1908 (0.1-0.3 mg/kg) and, particularly, traxoprodil (1--3 mg/kg) improved performance-increasing response speed and increasing the number of rewards earned during test. Finally, traxoprodil (1--10 mg/kg) improved accuracy and increased response speed in the DMTP task. CONCLUSIONS: The present studies support the view that selective NR2B NMDA antagonists promote impulsive-type responding in the 5-CSRTT; however, under certain test conditions, drugs of this class-notably traxoprodil-may also improve task performance.
RATIONALE: We previously reported that the NR2B subunit-selective N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) antagonist Ro 63-1908 produced a marked deficit in response control in the five-choice serial reaction time task (5-CSRTT). OBJECTIVES: The present studies were designed to investigate this further by studying the NR2BNMDA antagonists, ifenprodil, traxoprodil (CP101,606), Ro 25-6981 as well as Ro 63-1908 in this test. METHODS: Following training in the 5-CSRTT, separate groups of rats were either tested under (1) standard test conditions [5 s inter-trial interval (ITI), 0.5 s stimulus duration, 100 trials], (2) high (3 s ITI) and low (10 s ITI) event rate of stimulus presentation and (3) a 250-trial protocol in aged 2-year-old rats. In a final study, the effects of traxoprodil were investigated in an operant delayed match to position (DMTP) task, a test of working memory, and compared to dizocilpine and Ro 63-1908. RESULTS: Similar to Ro 63-1908, both traxoprodil (1-10 mg/kg) and Ro 25-6981 (3--30 mg/kg) increased premature responding but also increased response speed with no error trade-off. Conversely, ifenprodil (1--10 mg/kg) slowed response speed and increased omissions with no effect on premature responding. Tested under a variable ITI, Ro 63--1908 (1 mg/kg) increased premature responding at all ITIs, but this change was proportional to controls. At short ITI (3 s), Ro 63-1908 reliably improved performance both in terms of response speed and accuracy (percent correct). In a 250-trial protocol in aged rats, both Ro 63-1908 (0.1-0.3 mg/kg) and, particularly, traxoprodil (1--3 mg/kg) improved performance-increasing response speed and increasing the number of rewards earned during test. Finally, traxoprodil (1--10 mg/kg) improved accuracy and increased response speed in the DMTP task. CONCLUSIONS: The present studies support the view that selective NR2BNMDA antagonists promote impulsive-type responding in the 5-CSRTT; however, under certain test conditions, drugs of this class-notably traxoprodil-may also improve task performance.
Authors: Pierre N Tariot; Martin R Farlow; George T Grossberg; Stephen M Graham; Scott McDonald; Ivan Gergel Journal: JAMA Date: 2004-01-21 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Martin R Guscott; Hannah F Clarke; Fraser Murray; Sarah Grimwood; Linda J Bristow; Peter H Hutson Journal: Eur J Pharmacol Date: 2003-08-29 Impact factor: 4.432
Authors: Kristin Marquardt; Megan Josey; Johnny A Kenton; James F Cavanagh; Andrew Holmes; Jonathan L Brigman Journal: Neuroscience Date: 2019-02-08 Impact factor: 3.590
Authors: Sophie Dix; Gary Gilmour; Slavinka Potts; Janice W Smith; Mark Tricklebank Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2010-07-31 Impact factor: 4.530
Authors: Michael R Weed; Mark Bookbinder; Joseph Polino; Deborah Keavy; Rudolf N Cardinal; Jean Simmermacher-Mayer; Fu-ni L Cometa; Dalton King; Srinivasan Thangathirupathy; John E Macor; Linda J Bristow Journal: Neuropsychopharmacology Date: 2015-06-24 Impact factor: 7.853