Literature DB >> 15758438

The determinants of fracture in men.

J A Cauley1.   

Abstract

Osteoporosis represents an increasingly important clinical and public health problem among older men. Estimates indicated that 1-2 million (3-6%) men aged 50 years and over in the United States have osteoporosis and 8-13 million (28- 47%) have osteopenia. The lifetime risk of suffering a hip, spine or forearm fracture for a 50-year-old man is 13%, similar to the risk for prostate cancer. The number of osteoporotic fractures in men is expected to increase dramatically due to aging of the population and secular increases in fracture rates. Identification of men who are at greatest risk of osteoporosis and the risk factors, which predispose men to fracture, are essential so that preventive steps can be taken. Data on risk factors are emerging but many questions remain. Men may fracture at a higher bone mineral density (BMD) level than women. However, estimates of volumetric BMD, which correct in part for gender differences in bone size, and risk of fracture, may actually show similar relationships in men and women. Fracture rates are similar in older African American women and Caucasian men. Improved understanding of ethnic differences in fracture could identify potential reasons for gender differences. Family history and genetic factors are also important risk factors for fractures but the specific candidate genes are not known and whether gender modifies the effects of these genetic polymorphisms on BMD and the risk of fracture is also not known. In general, lifestyle factors and anthropometric measurements show similar relationships with fractures in men and women although few comprehensive prospective studies have been conducted. Current data will be reviewed on the relationships between markers of skeletal health, genetic polymorphisms, lifestyle and anthropometric factors and fracture.

Entities:  

Year:  2002        PMID: 15758438

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact        ISSN: 1108-7161            Impact factor:   2.041


  7 in total

1.  [DVO guideline 2006. What changes have there been in the diagnosis, prevention and treatment of osteoporosis?].

Authors:  W J Fassbender; U C Stumpf
Journal:  Z Rheumatol       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 1.372

2.  The relationship between body composition and bone mineral content: threshold effects in a racially and ethnically diverse group of men.

Authors:  T G Travison; A B Araujo; G R Esche; J B McKinlay
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2007-07-28       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Positive associations of bone mineral density with body mass index, physical activity, and blood triglyceride level in men over 70 years old: a TCVGHAGE study.

Authors:  Yih-Jing Tang; Wayne Huey-Herng Sheu; Pi-Haw Liu; Wen-Jane Lee; Ying-Tsung Chen
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2007-01-01       Impact factor: 2.626

Review 4.  Gender and race/ethnicity differences in hip fracture incidence, morbidity, mortality, and function.

Authors:  Robert S Sterling
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Race/ethnic differences in bone mineral densities in older men.

Authors:  H-S Nam; M-H Shin; J M Zmuda; P C Leung; E Barrett-Connor; E S Orwoll; J A Cauley
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2010-03-04       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Competitive athletic participation, thigh muscle strength, and bone density in elite senior athletes and controls.

Authors:  Jean L McCrory; Amanda J Salacinski; Sarah E Hunt Sellhorst; Susan L Greenspan
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 3.775

7.  Number of teeth is associated with hip fracture and femoral neck bone mineral density in the NHANES.

Authors:  Yau-Hua Yu; Wai S Cheung; Donald R Miller; Bjorn Steffensen
Journal:  Arch Osteoporos       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 2.879

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.