BACKGROUND: High levels of stress have been attributed to the conditions of police work, but there is little empirical evidence for this. AIMS: To develop a new instrument to measure job stress in the police; to assess the most severe and frequent police stressors; to compare levels of stress according to the demographic and organizational factors; and to study stress in relation to personality traits, work locus of control and coping strategies. METHODS: A comprehensive nationwide questionnaire survey of 3272 Norwegian police at all hierarchical levels, including the Norwegian Police Stress Survey (NPSS), the Job Stress Survey, the Basic Character Inventory, the Work Locus of Control Scale, and the Coping Strategies Scale. RESULTS: Work injuries were appraised as the most stressful but least frequent stressor and job pressure was reported the least severe but most frequent stressor. Females experienced job stressors less frequently, but appraised them as more severe than men did. Older police officers reported more job pressure severity and fewer work injuries. The police in districts where peer support was planned but not implemented, and who worked in districts with more than 50,000 inhabitants, perceived the lack of support more severely than others. The correlations between stress and personality traits, work locus of control, and coping were moderate. CONCLUSIONS: The NPSS captures police-specific stressors that are not adequately measured by global stress instruments. The study of stress in police work should preferably involve a nationwide use of police-specific stress instruments.
BACKGROUND: High levels of stress have been attributed to the conditions of police work, but there is little empirical evidence for this. AIMS: To develop a new instrument to measure job stress in the police; to assess the most severe and frequent police stressors; to compare levels of stress according to the demographic and organizational factors; and to study stress in relation to personality traits, work locus of control and coping strategies. METHODS: A comprehensive nationwide questionnaire survey of 3272 Norwegian police at all hierarchical levels, including the Norwegian Police Stress Survey (NPSS), the Job Stress Survey, the Basic Character Inventory, the Work Locus of Control Scale, and the Coping Strategies Scale. RESULTS: Work injuries were appraised as the most stressful but least frequent stressor and job pressure was reported the least severe but most frequent stressor. Females experienced job stressors less frequently, but appraised them as more severe than men did. Older police officers reported more job pressure severity and fewer work injuries. The police in districts where peer support was planned but not implemented, and who worked in districts with more than 50,000 inhabitants, perceived the lack of support more severely than others. The correlations between stress and personality traits, work locus of control, and coping were moderate. CONCLUSIONS: The NPSS captures police-specific stressors that are not adequately measured by global stress instruments. The study of stress in police work should preferably involve a nationwide use of police-specific stress instruments.
Authors: John M Violanti; Michael E Andrew; Anna Mnatsakanova; Tara A Hartley; Desta Fekedulegn; Cecil M Burchfiel Journal: Police Pract Res Date: 2015-02-27
Authors: Michael D Wirth; James Burch; Nitin Shivappa; John M Violanti; Cecil M Burchfiel; Desta Fekedulegn; Michael E Andrew; Tara A Hartley; Diane B Miller; Anna Mnatsakanova; Luenda E Charles; Susan E Steck; Thomas G Hurley; John E Vena; James R Hébert Journal: J Occup Environ Med Date: 2014-09 Impact factor: 2.162
Authors: Michael Wirth; John E Vena; Emily K Smith; Sarah E Bauer; John Violanti; James Burch Journal: Am J Ind Med Date: 2012-12-19 Impact factor: 2.214
Authors: Tara A Hartley; Cecil M Burchfiel; Desta Fekedulegn; Michael E Andrew; Sarah S Knox; John M Violanti Journal: Int J Emerg Ment Health Date: 2011
Authors: John M Violanti; Luenda E Charles; Ja K Gu; Cecil M Burchfiel; Michael E Andrew; P Nedra Joseph; Joan M Dorn Journal: Int Arch Occup Environ Health Date: 2012-11-25 Impact factor: 3.015