Literature DB >> 15757052

Accuracy of intraoperative gross examination of surgical margin status in women undergoing partial mastectomy for breast malignancy.

Glen C Balch1, Suhail K Mithani, Jean F Simpson, Mark C Kelley.   

Abstract

Margin status is an important prognostic factor for local recurrence after partial mastectomy for breast malignancy. Options for intraoperative evaluation of margin status include gross examination of the specimen, frozen section, and "touch preparation" cytology. This study evaluates the accuracy of gross examination without other intraoperative pathological analysis as a method of determining margin status. Records of 254 consecutive patients undergoing partial mastectomy for 255 breast malignancies (199 invasive, 56 DCIS) over 6 years were analyzed retrospectively. All women underwent en bloc excision of the primary lesion with gross examination of margin status by the surgeon and pathologist. All suspicious areas were reexcised, and the specimen was inked, serially sectioned at 2-3 mm intervals and examined with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) stains. Specimens with tumor <2 mm from a margin were considered margin-positive and those with all tumor > or =2 mm from the margin were designated margin-negative. One hundred fourteen (45%) of the 255 segmental resections were considered to have grossly tumor-free margins, and intraoperative reexcision was not performed. Ninety-six (84%) of these specimens had histologically negative margins. Gross examination prompted intraoperative reexcision in 141 (55%) cases. Ninety-five (67%) of these 141 resections had tumor-free margins on histopathology. Overall, the final margin was involved in 64 of the 255 partial mastectomies. Seventeen (27%) women with initially margin-positive resections underwent mastectomy, while 46 (72%) underwent reexcision, which was margin-negative in 41 (89%). After a median follow-up of 42 months, there have been eight (3.5%) local recurrences. The initial margin-positive rate was similar in ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) (30%) and invasive carcinoma (24%). Margin status was correlated with nodal status; there was no correlation with age, tumor size, grade hormone receptor status, or type of diagnostic biopsy. Gross examination of the resection specimen does not reflect margin status in at least 25 per cent of women undergoing partial mastectomy for breast malignancy. Other techniques for evaluation of margin status should be considered to reduce the need for reexcision of involved margins. We are currently designing a prospective clinical trial to examine the efficacy of new techniques for intraoperative evaluation of margin status.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15757052

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Surg        ISSN: 0003-1348            Impact factor:   0.688


  50 in total

1.  Automated classification of breast pathology using local measures of broadband reflectance.

Authors:  Ashley M Laughney; Venkataramanan Krishnaswamy; Pilar Beatriz Garcia-Allende; Olga M Conde; Wendy A Wells; Keith D Paulsen; Brian W Pogue
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2010 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.170

2.  Intraoperative imaging of positron emission tomographic radiotracers using Cerenkov luminescence emissions.

Authors:  Jason P Holland; Guillaume Normand; Alessandro Ruggiero; Jason S Lewis; Jan Grimm
Journal:  Mol Imaging       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 4.488

Review 3.  Direct tissue analysis by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization mass spectrometry: application to kidney biology.

Authors:  Kristen D Herring; Stacey R Oppenheimer; Richard M Caprioli
Journal:  Semin Nephrol       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 5.299

4.  [Minutes of the working group on gynecopathology and breast pathology. On the occasion of the 92nd Annual Congress of the German Society for Pathology in Berlin].

Authors:  S Lax; A Lebeau; A Schneider
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 1.011

5.  Assessing breast tumor margin by multispectral photoacoustic tomography.

Authors:  Rui Li; Pu Wang; Lu Lan; Frank P Lloyd; Craig J Goergen; Shaoxiong Chen; Ji-Xin Cheng
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2015-03-12       Impact factor: 3.732

Review 6.  Recent developments in breast-conserving surgery for breast cancer patients.

Authors:  F Fitzal; O Riedl; R Jakesz
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2008-09-10       Impact factor: 3.445

7.  Multidisciplinary Intraoperative Assessment of Breast Specimens Reduces Number of Positive Margins.

Authors:  S E Tevis; H B Neuman; E A Mittendorf; H M Kuerer; I Bedrosian; S M DeSnyder; A M Thompson; D M Black; M E Scoggins; A A Sahin; K K Hunt; A S Caudle
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2018-06-26       Impact factor: 5.344

8.  Photoacoustic and fluorescence image-guided surgery using a multifunctional targeted nanoprobe.

Authors:  Lei Xi; Guangyin Zhou; Ning Gao; Lily Yang; David A Gonzalo; Steven J Hughes; Huabei Jiang
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2014-02-20       Impact factor: 5.344

9.  The value of diffusion-weighted imaging in assessing the ADC changes of tissues adjacent to breast carcinoma.

Authors:  Zhang Yili; Huang Xiaoyan; Du Hongwen; Zhang Yun; Chen Xin; Wang Peng; Guo Youmin
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2009-01-14       Impact factor: 4.430

10.  Scatter spectroscopic imaging distinguishes between breast pathologies in tissues relevant to surgical margin assessment.

Authors:  Ashley M Laughney; Venkataramanan Krishnaswamy; Elizabeth J Rizzo; Mary C Schwab; Richard J Barth; Brian W Pogue; Keith D Paulsen; Wendy A Wells
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2012-08-20       Impact factor: 12.531

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.