Literature DB >> 15756582

Spatial variability of leaf wetness duration in different crop canopies.

Paulo C Sentelhas1, Terry J Gillespie, Jean C Batzer, Mark L Gleason, José Eduardo B A Monteiro, José Ricardo M Pezzopane, Mário J Pedro.   

Abstract

The spatial variability of leaf wetness duration (LWD) was evaluated in four different height-structure crop canopies: apple, coffee, maize, and grape. LWD measurements were made using painted flat plate, printed-circuit wetness sensors deployed in different positions above and inside the crops, with inclination angles ranging from 30 to 45 degrees. For apple trees, the sensors were installed in 12 east-west positions: 4 at each of the top (3.3 m), middle (2.1 m), and bottom (1.1 m) levels. For young coffee plants (80 cm tall), four sensors were installed close to the leaves at heights of 20, 40, 60, and 80 cm. For the maize and grape crops, LWD sensors were installed in two positions, one just below the canopy top and another inside the canopy. Adjacent to each experiment, LWD was measured above nearby mowed turfgrass with the same kind of flat plate sensor, deployed at 30 cm and between 30 and 45 degrees. We found average LWD varied by canopy position for apple and maize (P<0.05). In these cases, LWD was longer at the top, particularly when dew was the source of wetness. For grapes, cultivated in a hedgerow system and for young coffee plants, average LWD did not differ between the top and inside the canopy. The comparison by geometric mean regression analysis between crop and turfgrass LWD measurements showed that sensors at 30 cm over turfgrass provided quite accurate estimates of LWD at the top of the crops, despite large differences in crop height and structure, but poorer estimates for wetness within leaf canopies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15756582     DOI: 10.1007/s00484-005-0259-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Biometeorol        ISSN: 0020-7128            Impact factor:   3.787


  1 in total

1.  Electronic leaf wetness duration sensor: why it should be painted.

Authors:  P C Sentelhas; J E B A Monteiro; T J Gillespie
Journal:  Int J Biometeorol       Date:  2004-01-29       Impact factor: 3.787

  1 in total
  2 in total

1.  Leaf wetness duration measurement: comparison of cylindrical and flat plate sensors under different field conditions.

Authors:  Paulo C Sentelhas; Terry J Gillespie; Eduardo A Santos
Journal:  Int J Biometeorol       Date:  2006-11-24       Impact factor: 3.787

2.  Characterization of three-dimensional spatial aggregation and association patterns of brown rot symptoms within intensively mapped sour cherry trees.

Authors:  Sydney E Everhart; Ashley Askew; Lynne Seymour; Imre J Holb; Harald Scherm
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2011-02-17       Impact factor: 4.357

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.