Literature DB >> 15756181

Biomechanical comparisons of three different tibial tunnel directions in posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Sung-Jae Kim1, Jung Woog Shin, Chang Hun Lee, Ho Joon Shin, Su-Hyang Kim, Jae-Hoon Jeong, Jin Woo Lee.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate the effects of 3 different tunnel directions on the outcomes of posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstruction surgery based on the forces exerted on the replacement ligament from a biomechanical point of view. The 3 tunnel directions in the proximal tibia are medial, central, and lateral. TYPE OF STUDY: Biomechanical study.
METHODS: The forces exerted on the replaced PCL were calculated using finite element analyses as well as measurements from 6 cadavers. The results of the 3 surgical approaches were then compared. In the finite element analyses, the replaced ligament was assumed to have nonlinear elastic as well as viscoelastic properties. To simulate the overload in exercise, the femur was forced to move in the anterior direction abruptly while the tibia was held. From numerical analyses, the resultant forces, von Mises stresses, and maximum shear stresses on the replacement PCLs were calculated and compared. In the cadaveric study, a pressure-sensitive thin film was inserted between the replacement PCL and the killer turn area of the tibia. The color changes in films were evaluated using digital image processing in each case.
RESULTS: The medial approach showed remarkably higher stresses and forces on the interface between the replaced PCL and the killer turn in both the numerical and cadaveric study. In contrast, the lateral approach showed the lowest stresses.
CONCLUSIONS: The numerical and cadaveric studies indicate that the lateral approach is highly promising compared with the other approaches. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The lateral approach has been shown to minimize stress concentration around the killer turn during in vitro experiments and a computer simulation of PCL reconstruction for long-term stability. The lateral approach technique appears to provide a promising clinical outcome in patients undergoing PCL reconstruction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15756181     DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2004.11.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthroscopy        ISSN: 0749-8063            Impact factor:   4.772


  14 in total

1.  Post-tibial cyst formation over 2 years after posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Jin Hwan Ahn; Yong Seuk Lee; Moon Jong Chang
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2008-07-23       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  A novel transverse talar tunnel achieved less vessel damage and better drilling safety for ATFL reconstruction: a cadaveric study with three-dimensional microCT.

Authors:  Dingyu Wang; Zhongcheng Shen; Shuai Yang; Bo Zhang; Yanzhang Li; Yin Fang; Chen Jiao; Qinwei Guo; Weiguang Zhang; Dong Jiang
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2020-12-15       Impact factor: 4.060

3.  Peak stresses shift from femoral tunnel aperture to tibial tunnel aperture in lateral tibial tunnel ACL reconstructions: a 3D graft-bending angle measurement and finite-element analysis.

Authors:  Hans Van Der Bracht; Thomas Tampere; Pieter Beekman; Alexander Schepens; Wouter Devriendt; Michiel Cromheecke; Peter Verdonk; Jan Victor
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-11-09       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Regionally variant collagen alignment correlates with viscoelastic properties of the disc of the human temporomandibular joint.

Authors:  Shawn Gutman; Daniel Kim; Solaiman Tarafder; Sergio Velez; Julia Jeong; Chang H Lee
Journal:  Arch Oral Biol       Date:  2017-11-08       Impact factor: 2.633

5.  What Is the Maximum Tibial Tunnel Angle for Transtibial PCL Reconstruction? A Comparison Based on Virtual Radiographs, CT Images, and 3D Knee Models.

Authors:  Yuanjun Teng; Lijun Da; Gengxin Jia; Jie Hu; Zhongcheng Liu; Shifeng Zhang; Hua Han; Yayi Xia
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2022-01-13       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in patients with generalized joint laxity.

Authors:  Sung-Jae Kim; Ji-Hoon Chang; Kyung-Soo Oh
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-10-09       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Anatomical Reconstruction for Chronic Posterolateral Instability Combined with Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Surgical Technique.

Authors:  Sung-Jae Kim; Sung-Hwan Kim; Hee-Don Han; In-Sung Lee; Sung-Guk Kim; Yong-Min Chun
Journal:  JBJS Essent Surg Tech       Date:  2012-04-11

Review 8.  [The killer turn in the posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: mechanism and improvement].

Authors:  Yipeng Lin; Wufeng Cai; Xihao Huang; Jian Li; Qi Li
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2020-06-15

9.  Functional results of multiple revision anterior cruciate ligament with anterolateral tibial tunnel associated with anterolateral ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Camilo Partezani Helito; Andre Giardino Moreira da Silva; Tales Mollica Guimarães; Marcel Faraco Sobrado; José Ricardo Pécora; Gilberto Luis Camanho
Journal:  Knee Surg Relat Res       Date:  2022-05-08

10.  Femoral graft-tunnel angles in posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: analysis with 3-dimensional models and cadaveric experiments.

Authors:  Sung-Jae Kim; Yong-Min Chun; Sung-Hwan Kim; Hong-Kyo Moon; Jae-Won Jang
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 2.759

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.