Literature DB >> 15754777

Efficacy and adverse effects of patient-controlled epidural or intravenous analgesia after major surgery.

Yun-Hui Teng1, Jenkin S Hu, Shen-Kou Tsai, Chinsan Liew, Ping-Wing Lui.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this retrospective study was to determine whether epidural fentanyl-bupivacaine patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) was more efficacious and had fewer adverse effects than epidural or intravenous morphine PCA.
METHODS: We retrospectively retrieved data from 859 patients (mean age 64+/-7 years) who received continuous epidural medication, either morphine or fentanyl-bupivacaine PCA, or intravenous morphine PCA for postoperative pain control after major elective surgery from 1999 to 2000. Pain was assessed postoperatively using a verbal analogue pain scale (VAS, 0-10) during rest, mobilization, and coughing. Adverse effects including nausea, vomiting, pruritus, urinary retention, sedation, motor block, and respiratory depression (< 8 breaths per minute) were recorded. On the third postoperative day, the overall quality of pain control was evaluated using a pain relief scale (PRS, 1-4).
RESULTS: There were 201 patients who had epidural morphine PCA, 427 patients who had fentanyl-bupivacaine PCA, and 231 patients who had intravenous morphine PCA. Most patients (> 86%) who received epidural or intravenous PCA, either morphine or fentanyl combined with bupivacaine, experienced good pain relief (VAS, 0-3) during rest, mobilization, and coughing. Nonetheless, patients who received epidural morphine or fentanyl-bupivacaine had greater satisfaction with overall pain relief (PRS = 4) than did those who received intravenous morphine (p<0.05). Nausea and vomiting were most common in the epidural morphine group (p<0.05). Pruritus occurred least often in patients who received epidural fentanyl-bupivacaine analgesia (p < 0.05). There were no differences in other adverse events such as urinary retention, sedation, and motor block among the three groups. No respiratory depression was found in any patient.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients receiving epidural fentanyl-bupivacaine PCA experienced better overall pain relief, while morphine PCA, either epidurally or intravenously, caused more side effects. It is considered safe to use continuous epidural PCA with fentanyl-bupivacaine in patients receiving major elective surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15754777

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chang Gung Med J        ISSN: 2072-0939


  6 in total

1.  A comparison of the effect of epidural patient-controlled analgesia with intravenous patient-controlled analgesia on pain control after posterior lumbar instrumented fusion.

Authors:  Sang Hoon Lee; Kyung Hyun Kim; Seong-Mee Cheong; Sumi Kim; Mirang Kooh; Dong Kyu Chin
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2011-09-30

2.  Effect of Ketofol on Pain and Complication after Caesarean Delivery under Spinal Anaesthesia: A Randomized Double-blind Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Molouk Jaafarpour; Aminolah Vasigh; Javaher Khajavikhan; Ali Khani
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2017-03-01

3.  Comparison of the Effects of Sufentanil and Fentanyl Intravenous Patient Controlled Analgesia after Lumbar Fusion.

Authors:  Do Keun Kim; Seung Hwan Yoon; Ji Yong Kim; Chang Hyun Oh; Jong Kwon Jung; Jin Kim
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2016-12-29

4.  Randomized comparison of effectiveness of unimodal opioid analgesia with multimodal analgesia in post-cesarean section pain management.

Authors:  Adetunji Oladeni Adeniji; Oluseyi Olaboyede A Atanda
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2013-05-28       Impact factor: 3.133

5.  Analgesic efficacy of ropivacaine wound infusion after laparoscopic colorectal surgery.

Authors:  Bo Young Oh; Yoon Ah Park; Hye Young Koo; Seong Hyeon Yun; Hee Cheol Kim; Woo Yong Lee; Juhee Cho; Woo Seog Sim; Yong Beom Cho
Journal:  Ann Surg Treat Res       Date:  2016-09-30       Impact factor: 1.859

6.  Perioperative analgesia after intrathecal morphine or local infiltration anesthesia for total knee replacement: A protocol for randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Zhengrong Qi; Ai Guo; Lifeng Ma; Zhiyao Li; Bo Yang; Jingxin Zhang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-09-25       Impact factor: 1.817

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.