P A Nathan1, J A Istvan, K D Meadows. 1. Portland Hand Surgery and Rehabilitation Center, Portland, OR 97210-2997, USA. drnathan@qwest.net
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: There is currently little consensus regarding the appropriate surgical approach to treatment of cubital tunnel syndrome (CubTS), and few studies have reported long-term follow-up of patients who have received surgical treatment for ulnar nerve compression at the elbow. METHOD: Seventy-four patients with a total of 102 cases of CubTS treated with simple decompression of the ulnar nerve were examined 1.0-12.4 years postoperatively. Ulnar nerve conduction studies (slowest conducting 5 cm segment of ulnar nerve motor fibers measured at the elbow) were performed both pre- and postoperatively. The primary clinical outcome was percentage relief of symptoms, divided into "excellent" outcome group or less (> or = 90% improvement or < 90% improvement). RESULTS: Ulnar nerve conduction improved pre- to postoperatively, but clinical improvement was not related to changes in velocity. Women reported greater clinical improvement than men, and weight gain in men (but not women) predicted less improvement. Relief of cubital tunnel symptoms was greatest for those arms receiving carpal tunnel release surgery simultaneous or subsequent to cubital tunnel release. DISCUSSION: Simple decompression may offer excellent intermediate and long-term relief of symptoms associated with CubTS. Although improvement in ulnar motor nerve conduction velocity occurs following treatment of CubTS, it may not be a consistent marker of perceived symptom relief. Finally, these findings suggest that less complete relief of symptoms following ulnar nerve decompression may be related to unrecognized carpal tunnel syndrome or weight gain.
INTRODUCTION: There is currently little consensus regarding the appropriate surgical approach to treatment of cubital tunnel syndrome (CubTS), and few studies have reported long-term follow-up of patients who have received surgical treatment for ulnar nerve compression at the elbow. METHOD: Seventy-four patients with a total of 102 cases of CubTS treated with simple decompression of the ulnar nerve were examined 1.0-12.4 years postoperatively. Ulnar nerve conduction studies (slowest conducting 5 cm segment of ulnar nerve motor fibers measured at the elbow) were performed both pre- and postoperatively. The primary clinical outcome was percentage relief of symptoms, divided into "excellent" outcome group or less (> or = 90% improvement or < 90% improvement). RESULTS: Ulnar nerve conduction improved pre- to postoperatively, but clinical improvement was not related to changes in velocity. Women reported greater clinical improvement than men, and weight gain in men (but not women) predicted less improvement. Relief of cubital tunnel symptoms was greatest for those arms receiving carpal tunnel release surgery simultaneous or subsequent to cubital tunnel release. DISCUSSION: Simple decompression may offer excellent intermediate and long-term relief of symptoms associated with CubTS. Although improvement in ulnar motor nerve conduction velocity occurs following treatment of CubTS, it may not be a consistent marker of perceived symptom relief. Finally, these findings suggest that less complete relief of symptoms following ulnar nerve decompression may be related to unrecognized carpal tunnel syndrome or weight gain.