OBJECTIVE: To analyze the pattern of cell-surface expression of the triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells (TREM) 1 during septic shock. DESIGN AND SETTING: Prospective clinical study in an adult 16-bed medical ICU. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 25 septic shock patients, 15 patients with shock of noninfectious origin and 7 healthy volunteers. Arterial blood was drawn within 12 h of admission and subjected to flow cytometry analysis after staining with anti-TREM-1 and anti-CD14 antibodies. Repeated sampling was performed on days 2, 3, 5, 7, and 14 in septic shock patients. RESULTS: Monocytic TREM-1 expression was significantly higher in septic shock patients (mean fluorescence intensity 2.3+/-0.2) than in nonseptic patients (1.0+/-0.1), and healthy volunteers (1.0+/-0.1). There was no difference in monocytic TREM-1 expression between nonseptic patients and healthy volunteers or between any of the three groups with respect to TREM-1 expression on neutrophils. The time course of TREM-1 expression on monocytes diverged significantly by day 3 between survivors and ns. CONCLUSIONS: The specificity of TREM-1 regulation by infection is highlighted. Moreover, surface TREM-1 expression on monocytes may prove useful in allowing the follow-up of septic patients during the course of the disease.
OBJECTIVE: To analyze the pattern of cell-surface expression of the triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells (TREM) 1 during septic shock. DESIGN AND SETTING: Prospective clinical study in an adult 16-bed medical ICU. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 25 septic shockpatients, 15 patients with shock of noninfectious origin and 7 healthy volunteers. Arterial blood was drawn within 12 h of admission and subjected to flow cytometry analysis after staining with anti-TREM-1 and anti-CD14 antibodies. Repeated sampling was performed on days 2, 3, 5, 7, and 14 in septic shockpatients. RESULTS: Monocytic TREM-1 expression was significantly higher in septic shockpatients (mean fluorescence intensity 2.3+/-0.2) than in nonseptic patients (1.0+/-0.1), and healthy volunteers (1.0+/-0.1). There was no difference in monocytic TREM-1 expression between nonseptic patients and healthy volunteers or between any of the three groups with respect to TREM-1 expression on neutrophils. The time course of TREM-1 expression on monocytes diverged significantly by day 3 between survivors and ns. CONCLUSIONS: The specificity of TREM-1 regulation by infection is highlighted. Moreover, surface TREM-1 expression on monocytes may prove useful in allowing the follow-up of septic patients during the course of the disease.
Authors: J L Vincent; R Moreno; J Takala; S Willatts; A De Mendonça; H Bruining; C K Reinhart; P M Suter; L G Thijs Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 1996-07 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Enitan D Carrol; Limangeni A Mankhambo; Graham Jeffers; Deborah Parker; Malcolm Guiver; Paul Newland; Daniel L Banda; Elizabeth M Molyneux; Robert S Heyderman; Malcolm E Molyneux; C Anthony Hart Journal: PLoS One Date: 2009-08-13 Impact factor: 3.240