Literature DB >> 15753907

Quandaries in prescribing an emergency action plan and self-injectable epinephrine for first-aid management of anaphylaxis in the community.

Scott H Sicherer1, F Estelle R Simons.   

Abstract

Anaphylaxis often occurs in the community in the absence of a health care professional. Prompt administration of self-injectable epinephrine as first-aid treatment in the context of a personalized emergency action plan is the key to survival. There is little argument that physicians should prescribe self-injectable epinephrine for individuals who have already experienced anaphylaxis involving respiratory distress or shock triggered by allergens that might be encountered in the community. A quandary faced by physicians is that additional individuals with identified allergy who have no recognized prior history of anaphylaxis or who have a history of mild symptoms after exposure to a known trigger might also be at risk for subsequent life-threatening anaphylaxis and might also warrant prescription of self-injectable epinephrine. Prescribing for the latter individuals requires considerable clinical judgment and has led to controversy regarding possible overprescription or underprescription of self-injectable epinephrine. A second quandary for physicians occurs with regard to the advice they should give to at-risk individuals about actual use of their self-injectable epinephrine. It is difficult for health care professionals, let alone persons with no health care training, to predict whether anaphylaxis symptoms will occur in an at-risk individual after exposure to a known trigger. Moreover, at the onset of an acute allergic reaction, it is difficult to predict the symptoms that will ultimately develop. We examine these 2 common quandaries and provide examples of clinical scenarios and potential pitfalls in the management of persons identified as being at risk for anaphylaxis in the community. Additional studies of the recognition and treatment of anaphylaxis in the community are needed to develop comprehensive, evidence-based recommendations for its management in this setting.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15753907     DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2004.12.1122

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol        ISSN: 0091-6749            Impact factor:   10.793


  4 in total

Review 1.  Clinical immunology review series: an approach to the patient with anaphylaxis.

Authors:  T El-Shanawany; P E Williams; S Jolles
Journal:  Clin Exp Immunol       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 4.330

2.  Demonstration of epinephrine autoinjectors (EpiPen and Anapen) by pharmacists in a randomised, simulated patient assessment: acceptable, but room for improvement.

Authors:  Sandra M Salter; Richard Loh; Frank M Sanfilippo; Rhonda M Clifford
Journal:  Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol       Date:  2014-09-19       Impact factor: 3.406

3.  Epinephrine: the drug of choice for anaphylaxis-a statement of the world allergy organization.

Authors:  Stephen F Kemp; Richard F Lockey; F Estelle R Simons
Journal:  World Allergy Organ J       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 4.084

4.  Pilot Project of Special Emergency Medical Service Team for Anaphylaxis in Gangwon-do, Korea: Results from an Online Questionnaire Survey.

Authors:  Hyeonseung Lee; Jae-Woo Kwon; Yong Whi Jeong; Changhoon Lee; Jeongmin Lee
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2021-11-01       Impact factor: 2.153

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.