BACKGROUND: Asthma-associated morbidity is rising, especially in inner city children. OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the allergen sensitivities, allergen exposures, and associated morbidity for participants in the Inner City Asthma Study. We also determined geographic variations of indoor allergen levels. METHODS: Nine hundred thirty-seven inner city children 5 to 11 years old with moderate to severe asthma underwent allergen skin testing. Bedroom dust samples were evaluated for Der p 1, Der f 1, Bla g 1, Fel d 1, and Can f 1. RESULTS: Skin test sensitivities to cockroach (69%), dust mites (62%), and molds (50%) predominated, with marked study site-specific differences. Cockroach sensitivity was highest in the Bronx, New York, and Dallas (81.2%, 78.7%, and 78.5%, respectively), and dust mite sensitivity was highest in Dallas and Seattle (83.7% and 78.0%, respectively). A majority of homes in Chicago, New York, and the Bronx had cockroach allergen levels greater than 2 U/g, and a majority of those in Dallas and Seattle had dust mite allergen levels greater than 2 microg/g. Levels of both of these allergens were influenced by housing type. Cockroach allergen levels were highest in high-rise apartments, whereas dust mite allergen levels were highest in detached homes. Children who were both sensitive and exposed to cockroach allergen had significantly more asthma symptom days, more caretaker interrupted sleep, and more school days missed than children who were not sensitive or exposed. CONCLUSION: Geographic differences in allergen exposure and sensitivity exist among inner city children. Cockroach exposure and sensitivity predominate in the Northeast, whereas dust mite exposure and sensitivity are highest in the South and Northwest. Cockroach allergen appears to have a greater effect on asthma morbidity than dust mite or pet allergen in these children.
BACKGROUND:Asthma-associated morbidity is rising, especially in inner city children. OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the allergen sensitivities, allergen exposures, and associated morbidity for participants in the Inner City Asthma Study. We also determined geographic variations of indoor allergen levels. METHODS: Nine hundred thirty-seven inner city children 5 to 11 years old with moderate to severe asthma underwent allergen skin testing. Bedroom dust samples were evaluated for Der p 1, Der f 1, Bla g 1, Fel d 1, and Can f 1. RESULTS: Skin test sensitivities to cockroach (69%), dust mites (62%), and molds (50%) predominated, with marked study site-specific differences. Cockroach sensitivity was highest in the Bronx, New York, and Dallas (81.2%, 78.7%, and 78.5%, respectively), and dust mite sensitivity was highest in Dallas and Seattle (83.7% and 78.0%, respectively). A majority of homes in Chicago, New York, and the Bronx had cockroach allergen levels greater than 2 U/g, and a majority of those in Dallas and Seattle had dust mite allergen levels greater than 2 microg/g. Levels of both of these allergens were influenced by housing type. Cockroach allergen levels were highest in high-rise apartments, whereas dust mite allergen levels were highest in detached homes. Children who were both sensitive and exposed to cockroach allergen had significantly more asthma symptom days, more caretaker interrupted sleep, and more school days missed than children who were not sensitive or exposed. CONCLUSION: Geographic differences in allergen exposure and sensitivity exist among inner city children. Cockroach exposure and sensitivity predominate in the Northeast, whereas dust mite exposure and sensitivity are highest in the South and Northwest. Cockroach allergen appears to have a greater effect on asthma morbidity than dust mite or pet allergen in these children.
Authors: Kota Wada; Yoshinori Matsuwaki; Juhan Yoon; Linda M Benson; James L Checkel; Theresa A Bingemann; Hirohito Kita Journal: J Allergy Clin Immunol Date: 2010-06-09 Impact factor: 10.793
Authors: Lindsay Rosenfeld; Ginger L Chew; Rima Rudd; Karen Emmons; Luis Acosta; Matt Perzanowski; Dolores Acevedo-García Journal: J Urban Health Date: 2011-02 Impact factor: 3.671
Authors: Judith A Woodfolk; Jill Glesner; Paul W Wright; Christopher L Kepley; Mi Li; Martin Himly; Lyndsey M Muehling; Alla Gustchina; Alexander Wlodawer; Martin D Chapman; Anna Pomés Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2015-12-07 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: Junenette L Peters; Jonathan I Levy; Christine A Rogers; Harriet A Burge; John D Spengler Journal: J Urban Health Date: 2007-03 Impact factor: 3.671
Authors: Stuart L Abramson; Anne Turner-Henson; Lise Anderson; Mary P Hemstreet; L Kay Bartholomew; Christine L M Joseph; Shenghui Tang; Shellie Tyrrell; Noreen M Clark; Dennis Ownby Journal: J Sch Health Date: 2006-08 Impact factor: 2.118