BACKGROUND: T cells and macrophages play a major role in the rejection of xenografted islets. Depending on the phylogenetic disparity, direct or indirect antigen presentation is predominant. The aim of this study was to analyze in vitro the predominance of direct or indirect presentation by depleting antigen-presenting cells in concordant and discordant xenogeneic combinations. In vivo, we analyzed the effect of macrophage depletion on concordant and discordant islet xenograft survival to assess in which combination this strategy can be used as therapeutic tool. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In vitro, we performed mouse anti-rat and anti-human mixed lymphocyte reactions (MLR) after depletion of responder or stimulator antigen-presenting cells by magnetic sorting. In vivo, streptozotocin-induced diabetic C57BL/6 mice were treated by gadolinium chloride (GdCl) to deplete macrophages, and rat or human islets were transplanted under the kidney capsule. Islet function was followed by glycemia, and xenografts were analyzed at regular intervals for histology and immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: Mouse anti-rat MLR showed a predominant direct antigen presentation pathway, whereas in mouse anti-human MLR, direct and indirect pathways were similarly involved. Survival of rat islets was not modified by GdCl therapy. In contrast, survival of human islets was significantly prolonged in GdCl-treated mice. Macrophage infiltration was decreased in concordant and discordant GdCl-treated xenografts at day 4 compared with controls. At day 15, macrophage, CD4+, and CD8+ cell infiltration was similar in all groups. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that direct antigen presentation is dominant in the rejection mechanism of concordant islet xenografts and cannot be influenced by host macrophage depletion. Both direct and indirect antigen presentation are involved in rejection of discordant xenogeneic islets. Macrophage depletion should only be considered as therapeutic tool for discordant islet xenotransplantation.
BACKGROUND: T cells and macrophages play a major role in the rejection of xenografted islets. Depending on the phylogenetic disparity, direct or indirect antigen presentation is predominant. The aim of this study was to analyze in vitro the predominance of direct or indirect presentation by depleting antigen-presenting cells in concordant and discordant xenogeneic combinations. In vivo, we analyzed the effect of macrophage depletion on concordant and discordant islet xenograft survival to assess in which combination this strategy can be used as therapeutic tool. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In vitro, we performed mouse anti-rat and anti-human mixed lymphocyte reactions (MLR) after depletion of responder or stimulator antigen-presenting cells by magnetic sorting. In vivo, streptozotocin-induced diabetic C57BL/6 mice were treated by gadolinium chloride (GdCl) to deplete macrophages, and rat or human islets were transplanted under the kidney capsule. Islet function was followed by glycemia, and xenografts were analyzed at regular intervals for histology and immunohistochemistry. RESULTS:Mouse anti-rat MLR showed a predominant direct antigen presentation pathway, whereas in mouse anti-human MLR, direct and indirect pathways were similarly involved. Survival of rat islets was not modified by GdCl therapy. In contrast, survival of human islets was significantly prolonged in GdCl-treated mice. Macrophage infiltration was decreased in concordant and discordant GdCl-treated xenografts at day 4 compared with controls. At day 15, macrophage, CD4+, and CD8+ cell infiltration was similar in all groups. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that direct antigen presentation is dominant in the rejection mechanism of concordant islet xenografts and cannot be influenced by host macrophage depletion. Both direct and indirect antigen presentation are involved in rejection of discordant xenogeneic islets. Macrophage depletion should only be considered as therapeutic tool for discordant islet xenotransplantation.
Authors: Robert J Plenter; Todd J Grazia; An N Doan; Ronald G Gill; Biagio A Pietra Journal: J Heart Lung Transplant Date: 2012-07-11 Impact factor: 10.247
Authors: Till Strowig; Anthony Rongvaux; Chozhavendan Rathinam; Hitoshi Takizawa; Chiara Borsotti; William Philbrick; Elizabeth E Eynon; Markus G Manz; Richard A Flavell Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2011-07-25 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Hyeon Il Lee; Mee Kum Kim; Joo Youn Oh; Jung Hwa Ko; Hyun Ju Lee; Won Ryang Wee; Jin Hak Lee Journal: J Korean Med Sci Date: 2008-06 Impact factor: 2.153
Authors: Raphael P H Meier; Jörg D Seebach; Philippe Morel; Redouan Mahou; Sophie Borot; Laurianne Giovannoni; Geraldine Parnaud; Elisa Montanari; Domenico Bosco; Christine Wandrey; Thierry Berney; Leo H Bühler; Yannick D Muller Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-03-13 Impact factor: 3.240