Literature DB >> 15753348

Nutritionally altering weight gain patterns of pregnant heifers and young cows changes the time that feed resources are offered without any differences in production.

H C Freetly1, C L Ferrell, T G Jenkins.   

Abstract

We hypothesized that feed resources could be deferred to a later time in the production cycle without a decrease in fertility or weight of calf produced in heifers and young cows. One-hundred and thirty-one MARC III (four breed composite: (1/4) Hereford, (1/4) Angus, (1/4) Red Poll, and (1/4) Pinzgauer) heifers were divided into three treatments: M-M-M-M (n = 46), L-H-M-M (n = 41), and L-L-L-H (n = 44). The experiment consisted of four feeding periods. Period 1 was 94 to 186 d of gestation, and heifers were fed a moderate (M) or low (L) level of feed. Period 2 was 187 d of gestation to parturition, and heifers were fed moderate, high (H), or low levels of feed. Period 3 was from parturition through 27 d of lactation, and heifers were fed moderate or low levels of feed. Period 4 was from 28 d to approximately 63 d of lactation, and heifers were fed moderate or high levels of feed. Females remained within treatments through their first parity (heifers) and second parity (cows). Feed intake of L-H-M-M and M-M-M-M treatments did not differ from each other either as heifers (P = 0.23) or as second-parity cows (P > 0.59). The L-L-L-H heifers ate less feed than L-H-M-M and M-M-M-M heifers (P < 0.001), and second-parity L-L-L-H cows ate less feed than second-parity L-H-M-M and M-M-M-M cows (P < 0.002). In the first parity, treatments did not differ in the percentage of calves weaned (P = 0.11), weight of calf weaned (P = 0.50), or percentage of cows diagnosed pregnant (P = 0.29) with a second calf. In the second parity, treatments did not differ in the percentage of calves weaned (P = 0.77), weight of calf weaned (P = 0.63), or percentage of cows expressing a corpus luteum at the start of breeding for their third calf (P = 0.21). Our findings suggest that timing nutrient availability to heifers and primiparous cows can be used to change the time that feed resources are used.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15753348     DOI: 10.2527/2005.834916x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  4 in total

1.  Effects of feeding stockpiled tall fescue versus summer-baled tall fescue-based hay to late gestation beef cows: I. Cow performance, maternal metabolic status, and fetal growth.

Authors:  Katlyn N Niederecker; Jill M Larson; Robert L Kallenbach; Allison M Meyer
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-11-21       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  Relationship between performance, metabolic profile, and feed efficiency of lactating beef cows.

Authors:  Luana Lelis Souza; Mariana Furtado Zorzetto; Túlio José Terra Ricci; Roberta Carrilho Canesin; Nhayandra Christina Dias E Silva; João Alberto Negrão; Joslaine Noely Dos Santos Gonçalves Cyrillo; Maria Eugênia Zerlotti Mercadante
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2019-05-08       Impact factor: 1.559

3.  Herbage mass and allowance and animal genotype affect daily herbage intake, productivity, and efficiency of beef cows grazing native subtropical grassland.

Authors:  Martin Do Carmo; Teresa C M Genro; Andrés F Cibils; Pablo M Soca
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 3.338

4.  Gestation Food Restriction and Refeeding Compensate Maternal Energy Status and Alleviate Metabolic Consequences in Juvenile Offspring in a Rabbit Model.

Authors:  Rosa M Garcia-Garcia; María Arias-Alvarez; Pilar Millan; María Rodriguez Francisco; Ana Sanchez Rodriguez; Pedro L Lorenzo; Pilar G Rebollar
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2021-01-22       Impact factor: 5.717

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.