Literature DB >> 15753065

Hand preference, practice order, and spatial assimilations in rapid bimanual movement.

D E Sherwood1.   

Abstract

When subjects make rapid bimanual aiming movements over different distances, spatial assimilations are shown; the shorter distance limb overshoots when paired with a longer distance limb. Recent research has also shown spatial assimilations to be greater in the nonpreferred left limb of right-handed subjects, but it is not known whether the increased spatial assimilations represent a handedness effect or one of hemispheric lateralization of motor control. To determine the nature of the asymmetric effect, left- (n = 32) and right- (n = 60) handed subjects part practiced, then whole practiced, short (20 degrees ) and long 60 degrees ) reversal movements. During whole practice, both groups showed spatial assimilations in the shorter distance limb, particularly when the left limb performed the short movement. This asymmetry was greatest for right-handed subjects, but left-handed subjects showed smaller, but systematic effects, providing moderate support for the hypothesis that the asymmetric effect is due to hemispheric lateralization of motor control. All interlimb differences in spatial accuracy for the short and long movements were eliminated with practice, however, suggesting the asymmetric effect was temporary as well. In addition, subjects who part practiced the long movement just prior to whole practice showed greater overshooting in the short distance limb compared with subjects who followed the other practice order throughout whole practice and the no-KR retention trials. Such findings suggest that the part-practice order of bimanual tasks can directionally bias whole-task performance.

Year:  1994        PMID: 15753065     DOI: 10.1080/00222895.1994.9941667

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mot Behav        ISSN: 0022-2895            Impact factor:   1.328


  21 in total

1.  Interlimb differences of directional biases for stroke production.

Authors:  Wanyue Wang; Travis Johnson; Robert L Sainburg; Natalia Dounskaia
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-11-11       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Asymmetric interference in left-handers during bimanual movements reflects switch in lateralized control characteristics.

Authors:  Florian A Kagerer
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Intermanual interactions in discrete and periodic bimanual movements with same and different amplitudes.

Authors:  Herbert Heuer; Wolfhard Klein
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-09-21       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  The modulation of intermanual interactions during the specification of the directions of bimanual movements.

Authors:  Herbert Heuer; Wolfhard Klein
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-12-14       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Spatial interference during bimanual coordination: differential brain networks associated with control of movement amplitude and direction.

Authors:  Nicole Wenderoth; Filiep Debaere; Stefan Sunaert; Stephan P Swinnen
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  The influence of movement cues on intermanual interactions.

Authors:  Herbert Heuer; Wolfhard Klein
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2005-08-05

7.  Multiple frames of reference for bimanual co-ordination.

Authors:  Herbert Heuer
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-06-09       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Response preparation changes during practice of an asynchronous bimanual movement.

Authors:  Dana Maslovat; Anthony N Carlsen; Romeo Chua; Ian M Franks
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-04-22       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Limitations on coupling of bimanual movements caused by arm dominance: when the muscle homology principle fails.

Authors:  Natalia Dounskaia; Keith G Nogueira; Stephan P Swinnen; Elizabeth Drummond
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-01-13       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Bimanual reaches with symbolic cues exhibit errors in target selection.

Authors:  Jarrod Blinch; Brendan D Cameron; Ian M Franks; Romeo Chua
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-06-18       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.