Literature DB >> 15752904

Combining vascular and cellular targeting regimens enhances the efficacy of photodynamic therapy.

Bin Chen1, Brian W Pogue, P Jack Hoopes, Tayyaba Hasan.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Photodynamic therapy (PDT) can be designed to target either tumor vasculature or tumor cells by varying the drug-light interval. Photodynamic therapy treatments with different drug-light intervals can be combined to increase tumor response by targeting both tumor vasculature and tumor cells. The sequence of photosensitizer and light delivery can influence the effect of combined treatments. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The R3327-MatLyLu rat prostate tumor model was used in this study. Photosensitizer verteporfin distribution was quantified by fluorescence microscopy. Tumor blood flow changes were monitored by laser-Doppler system and tumor hypoxia was quantified by the immunohistochemical staining for the hypoxic marker EF5. The therapeutic effects of PDT treatments were evaluated by the histologic examination and tumor regrowth assay.
RESULTS: Fluorescence microscopic studies indicated that tumor localization of verteporfin changed from predominantly within the tumor vasculature at 15 min after injection, to being throughout the tumor parenchyma at 3 h after injection. Light treatment (50 J/cm(2)) at 15 min after verteporfin injection (0.25 mg/kg, i.v.) induced significant tumor vascular damage, as manifested by tumor blood flow reduction and increase in the tumor hypoxic fraction. In contrast, the vascular effect observed after the same light dose (50 J/cm(2)) delivered 3 h after administration of verteporfin (1 mg/kg, i.v.) was an initial acute decrease in blood flow, followed by recovery to the level of control. The EF5 staining revealed no significant increase in hypoxic fraction at 1 h after PDT using 3 h drug-light interval. The combination of 3-h interval PDT and 15-min interval PDT was more effective in inhibiting tumor growth than each individual PDT treatment. However, it was found that the combined treatment with the sequence of 3-h interval PDT before 15-min interval PDT led to a superior antitumor effect than the other combinative PDT treatments. Histologic studies confirmed that this combined treatment led to damage to both tumor vasculature and tumor cells. Importantly, the combined PDT treatment did not increase normal tissue damage and tissue recovered well at 60 days after treatment.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that targeting both tumor vascular and cellular compartments by combining a long-interval PDT with a short-interval PDT can be an effective and safe way to enhance PDT damage to tumor tissue.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15752904     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.08.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  40 in total

Review 1.  Imaging and photodynamic therapy: mechanisms, monitoring, and optimization.

Authors:  Jonathan P Celli; Bryan Q Spring; Imran Rizvi; Conor L Evans; Kimberley S Samkoe; Sarika Verma; Brian W Pogue; Tayyaba Hasan
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2010-05-12       Impact factor: 60.622

Review 2.  Tumor ablation and nanotechnology.

Authors:  Rachel L Manthe; Susan P Foy; Nishanth Krishnamurthy; Blanka Sharma; Vinod Labhasetwar
Journal:  Mol Pharm       Date:  2010-10-07       Impact factor: 4.939

Review 3.  Photodynamic therapy in the management of pre-malignant head and neck mucosal dysplasia and microinvasive carcinoma.

Authors:  Harry Quon; Craig E Grossman; Jarod C Finlay; Timothy C Zhu; Clarice S Clemmens; Kelly M Malloy; Theresa M Busch
Journal:  Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 3.631

4.  In vivo evaluation of battery-operated light-emitting diode-based photodynamic therapy efficacy using tumor volume and biomarker expression as endpoints.

Authors:  Srivalleesha Mallidi; Zhiming Mai; Imran Rizvi; Joshua Hempstead; Stephen Arnason; Jonathan Celli; Tayyaba Hasan
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 3.170

5.  Intravital microscopic analysis of vascular perfusion and macromolecule extravasation after photodynamic vascular targeting therapy.

Authors:  Chong He; Priyanka Agharkar; Bin Chen
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2008-04-30       Impact factor: 4.200

Review 6.  Optical Imaging, Photodynamic Therapy and Optically Triggered Combination Treatments.

Authors:  Srivalleesha Mallidi; Bryan Q Spring; Tayyaba Hasan
Journal:  Cancer J       Date:  2015 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.360

7.  Fluence rate-dependent intratumor heterogeneity in physiologic and cytotoxic responses to Photofrin photodynamic therapy.

Authors:  Theresa M Busch; Xiaoman Xing; Guoqiang Yu; Arjun Yodh; E Paul Wileyto; Hsing-Wen Wang; Turgut Durduran; Timothy C Zhu; Ken Kang-Hsin Wang
Journal:  Photochem Photobiol Sci       Date:  2009-10-15       Impact factor: 3.982

8.  Photodynamic therapy-induced angiogenic signaling: consequences and solutions to improve therapeutic response.

Authors:  Shannon M Gallagher-Colombo; Amanda L Maas; Min Yuan; Theresa M Busch
Journal:  Isr J Chem       Date:  2012-09-01       Impact factor: 3.333

Review 9.  Optical and x-ray technology synergies enabling diagnostic and therapeutic applications in medicine.

Authors:  Brian W Pogue; Brian C Wilson
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 3.170

10.  Vessel-Targeted Chemophototherapy with Cationic Porphyrin-Phospholipid Liposomes.

Authors:  Dandan Luo; Jumin Geng; Nasi Li; Kevin A Carter; Shuai Shao; G Ekin Atilla-Gokcumen; Jonathan F Lovell
Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther       Date:  2017-07-20       Impact factor: 6.261

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.