Literature DB >> 15752885

Feasibility of dose escalation using intensity-modulated radiotherapy in posthysterectomy cervical carcinoma.

Warren D D'Souza1, Anesa A Ahamad, Revathy B Iyer, Mohammad R Salehpour, Anuja Jhingran, Patricia J Eifel.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate retrospectively the utility of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) in reducing the volume of normal tissues receiving radiation at varying dose levels when the female pelvis after hysterectomy is treated to doses of 50.4 Gy and 54 Gy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Computed tomography scans from 10 patients who had previously undergone conventional postoperative RT were selected. The clinical tumor volume (vaginal apex and iliac nodes) and organs at risk were contoured. Margins were added to generate the planning tumor volume. The Pinnacle and Corvus planning systems were used to develop conventional and IMRT plans, respectively. Conventional four-field plans were prescribed to deliver 45 Gy (4F(45 Gy)) or 50.4 Gy; eight-field IMRT plans were prescribed to deliver 50.4 Gy (IMRT(50.4 Gy)) or 54 Gy (IMRT(54 Gy)) to the planning tumor volume. All plans were normalized so that > or =97% of the planning tumor volume received the prescribed dose. Student's t test was used to compare the volumes of organs at risk receiving the same doses with different plans.
RESULTS: The mean volume of bowel receiving > or =45 Gy was lower with the IMRT(50.4 Gy) (33% lower) and IMRT(54 Gy) (18% lower) plans than with the 4F(45 Gy) plan. The mean volume of rectum receiving > or =45 Gy or > or =50 Gy was also significantly reduced with the IMRT plans despite an escalation of the prescribed dose from 45 Gy with the conventional plans to 54 Gy with IMRT. The mean volume of bladder treated to 45 Gy was the same or slightly lower with the IMRT(50.4 Gy) and IMRT(54 Gy) plans compared with the 4F(45 Gy) plan. Compared with the 4F(45 Gy) plan, the IMRT(50.4 Gy) plan resulted in a smaller volume of bowel receiving 35-45 Gy and a larger volume of bowel receiving 50-55 Gy. Compared with the 4F(45 Gy) plan, the IMRT(54 Gy) plan resulted in smaller volumes of bowel receiving 45-50 Gy; however, small volumes of bowel received 55-60 Gy with the IMRT plan.
CONCLUSION: Intensity-modulated RT may permit an increase in the radiation dose that can safely be delivered to the central pelvis and pelvic lymph nodes after hysterectomy. However, dose-volume calculations using individual CT scans do not account for internal organ motion. Detailed data concerning the relationships among radiation dose, treatment volume, and treatment effects are lacking, and prospective studies of pelvic IMRT are needed to determine the safety and efficacy of this treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15752885     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.07.721

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  9 in total

1.  Intensity-modulated arc therapy with simultaneous integrated boost in the treatment of primary irresectable cervical cancer. Treatment planning, quality control, and clinical implementation.

Authors:  Katrien Vandecasteele; Wilfried De Neve; Werner De Gersem; Louke Delrue; Leen Paelinck; Amin Makar; Valérie Fonteyne; Carlos De Wagter; Geert Villeirs; Gert De Meerleer
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.621

2.  Pattern of failure in bladder cancer patients treated with radical cystectomy: rationale for adjuvant radiotherapy.

Authors:  Yong Bae Kim; Sung Joon Hong; Seung Cheol Yang; Jae Ho Cho; Young Deuk Choi; Gwi Eon Kim; Koon Ho Rha; Woong Kyu Han; Nam Hoon Cho; Young Taek Oh
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2010-05-24       Impact factor: 2.153

3.  Intensity-modulated radiotherapy in patients with cervical cancer. An intra-individual comparison of prone and supine positioning.

Authors:  Carmen Stromberger; Yves Kom; Michael Kawgan-Kagan; Tristan Mensing; Ulrich Jahn; Achim Schneider; Volker Budach; Christhardt Köhler; Simone Marnitz
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2010-07-02       Impact factor: 3.481

4.  Rectum separation in patients with cervical cancer for treatment planning in primary chemo-radiation.

Authors:  Simone Marnitz; Volker Budach; Friederike Weisser; Elena Burova; Bernhard Gebauer; Filiberto Guiseppe Vercellino; Christhardt Köhler
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2012-07-12       Impact factor: 3.481

5.  Comparison of conformal and intensity modulated radiation therapy techniques for treatment of pelvic tumors. Analysis of acute toxicity.

Authors:  Robson Ferrigno; Adriana Santos; Lidiane C Martins; Eduardo Weltman; Michael J Chen; Roberto Sakuraba; Cleverson P Lopes; José C Cruz
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2010-12-14       Impact factor: 3.481

6.  Dosimetric comparison of high dose rate brachytherapy and intensity-modulated radiation therapy for cervical carcinoma.

Authors:  B Shwetha; M Ravikumar; Siddanna R Palled; Sanjay S Supe; S Sathiyan
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2011-04

Review 7.  Dosimetric comparison of intensity modulated radiotherapy and three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy in patients with gynecologic malignancies: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Baojuan Yang; Lin Zhu; Haiyan Cheng; Qi Li; Yunyan Zhang; Yashuang Zhao
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2012-11-23       Impact factor: 3.481

8.  Effect of different treatment plans on irradiated small-bowel volume in gynecologic patients undergoing whole-pelvic irradiation.

Authors:  Shih-Chen Chang; Hsiao-Fei Lee; Hui-Min Ting; Tzu-Chao Pan; Shu-Yu Liu; Chien-Fu Chen; Teng-Yi Wang; Kuo-Jung Juan; Tsung-I Liao; Eng-Yen Huang
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2013-03-27       Impact factor: 2.724

9.  Adjuvant chemotherapy for early-stage cervical cancer.

Authors:  Hiroshi Asano; Yukiharu Todo; Hidemichi Watari
Journal:  Chin J Cancer Res       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 5.087

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.