Literature DB >> 15752479

Using persuasive messages to encourage voluntary hearing protection among coal miners.

Michael T Stephenson1, Kim Witte, Charles Vaught, Brian L Quick, Steve Booth-Butterfield, Dhaval Patel, Cynthia Zuckerman.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: This longitudinal field study was designed to encourage Appalachian coal miners in West Virginia and Pennsylvania to engage in hearing-protection behaviors.
METHOD: Participants were mailed postcards that featured either a positive, negative, or neutral message on the outside of the postcard and a message encouraging hearing protection behaviors on the inside. The first posttest measurement of the effectiveness of the persuasive messages was conducted about a week after the postcards were mailed. The delayed posttest measurement was conducted six weeks later.
RESULTS: Responses from 307 coal miners revealed that the positive or neutral messages generated significantly more self-reported hearing protection behaviors than the negative message. Identical results were obtained in a delayed posttest assessment of miners' self-reported hearing protection behaviors. The positive message was also more effective than either the neutral or negative message in preventing defensive mechanisms from emerging over time. IMPACT ON INDUSTRY: Positive and neutral messages were convincingly more successful than negative messages in facilitating self-reported hearing protection behaviors among coal miners. Similarly, the positive messages kept defensive processes at bay.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15752479     DOI: 10.1016/j.jsr.2004.09.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Safety Res        ISSN: 0022-4375


  6 in total

1.  The effects of a computer-tailored message on secondary prevention in type 2 diabetes: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Sandra Y Adams; Albert G Crawford; Rajiv N Rimal; Joyce S Lee; Laura M Janneck; Christopher N Sciamanna
Journal:  Popul Health Manag       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 2.459

2.  Indicators of hearing protection use: self-report and researcher observation.

Authors:  Stephanie C Griffin; Richard Neitzel; William E Daniell; Noah S Seixas
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 2.155

3.  Effects of interventions on use of hearing protectors among farm operators: A randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Marjorie C McCullagh; Tanima Banerjee; Michael A Cohen; James J Yang
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2016-01-14       Impact factor: 2.117

4.  Prevalence of hearing loss among noise-exposed workers within the Mining and Oil and Gas Extraction sectors, 2006-2015.

Authors:  Sean M Lawson; Elizabeth A Masterson; Amanda S Azman
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  2019-07-26       Impact factor: 3.079

5.  Occupational Safety and Work-Related Injury Control Efforts in Qatar: Lessons Learned from a Rapidly Developing Economy.

Authors:  Rafael J Consunji; Amber Mehmood; Nazia Hirani; Ayman El-Menyar; Aisha Abeid; Adnan A Hyder; Hassan Al-Thani; Ruben Peralta
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-09-21       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Study of the noise spectrum on high frequency thresholds in workers exposed to noise.

Authors:  Aurea Oliveira Canha Ottoni; Anadergh Barbosa-Branco; Marlene Escher Boger; Sérgio Luiz Garavelli
Journal:  Braz J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2012 Jul-Aug
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.